Evaluating the implementation of a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test-based (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care

被引:0
|
作者
Adhikari, Kamala [1 ,2 ]
Mughal, Muhammad Kashif [1 ]
Whitworth, James [1 ]
Hignell, Danica [1 ]
Moysey, Barbara [3 ]
Chishtie, Jawad [1 ]
Teare, Gary F. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Alberta Hlth Serv, Canc Prevent & Screening Innovat CPSI, Publ Hlth Evidence & Innovat PHEI, Prov Populat & Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Alberta Hlth Serv, Screening Programs, Prov Populat & Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Alberta Hlth Serv, Publ Hlth Evidence & Innovat PHEI, Prov Populat & Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
Health Behavior; Patient education; Primary care; Process mapping; Quality improvement; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Screening has proven effective at reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is recommended for screening people aged 50-74 years at average risk of CRC in Alberta, Canada. This project implemented a multicomponent intervention in real-world, primary care settings in Alberta to improve the FIT participation rate and evaluated the reach, effectiveness and implementation outcomes. The multicomponent intervention comprised of in-clinic FIT kit distribution, patient education and reminder calls, was implemented in four primary care clinics. Reach was measured as the proportion of patients receiving the intervention. Effectiveness was measured by comparing the proportion of patients completing FIT during preintervention and perintervention periods. Implementation was measured by the perceived acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of providers in implementing the intervention. Data were collected from electronic medical records and validated survey tools. Four clinics implemented the intervention during an 8-month study period (September 2021 to April 2022); 99% of eligible patients received a FIT kit. The baseline FIT completion rate across participating clinics was 62%, which increased by 13 percentage points to 75% during the intervention period. Of the 75% who completed the FIT, 56% did without a reminder call, whereas 19% did so after receiving one or more reminders. More than 90% of providers perceived the intervention implementation as acceptable, feasible and appropriate. The multicomponent FIT intervention was perceived as acceptable, feasible, and appropriate and improved the FIT screening rates in pilot clinics. An implementation guidance document has been developed and tested to communicate the implementation process for use by other primary care clinics and aid in the spread of the intervention across Alberta. Implementing this intervention in routine practice can help decrease the incidence and mortality of CRC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers and facilitators of implementing a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics, Alberta
    Adhikari, Kamala
    Mah, Sharon S.
    Patterson, Michelle
    Teare, Gary F.
    Manalili, Kimberly
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [2] Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
    Manon van der Vlugt
    Esmée J Grobbee
    Patrick MM Bossuyt
    Evelien Bongers
    Wolfert Spijker
    Ernst J Kuipers
    Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
    Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
    Manon C W Spaander
    Evelien Dekker
    British Journal of Cancer, 2017, 116 : 44 - 49
  • [3] Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
    van der Vlugt, Manon
    Grobbee, Esmee J.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Bongers, Evelien
    Spijker, Wolfert
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    Spaander, Manon C. W.
    Dekker, Evelien
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 116 (01) : 44 - 49
  • [4] Faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening in Mexico: an initial experience
    Remes-Troche, Jose Maria
    Hinojosa-Garza, Gabriela
    Espinosa-Tamez, Priscilla
    Meixueiro-Daza, Arturo
    Grube-Pagola, Peter
    Van Loon, Katherine
    Potter, Michael B.
    Lajous, Martin
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 37 (03) : 321 - 324
  • [5] Faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening programme SVIT in Slovenia: pilot phase
    Tepes, Bojan
    Stabuc, Borut
    Stefanovic, Milan
    Bracko, Matej
    Grazio, Snezana Frkovic
    Mlakar, Dominika Novak
    Zakotnik, Jozica Maucec
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 23 (04) : 235 - 239
  • [6] Patterns of participation over multiple rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening for colorectal cancer
    Osborne, Joanne M.
    Duncan, Amy
    Wilson, Carlene
    Turnbull, Deborah
    Flight, Ingrid
    Cole, Stephen R.
    Young, Graeme
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 27 - 27
  • [7] Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study
    Clarke, Nicholas
    Gallagher, Pamela
    Kearney, Patricia M.
    McNamara, Deirdre
    Sharp, Linda
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 25 (12) : 1456 - 1462
  • [8] Strategies to minimise the current disadvantages experienced by women in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening
    Clark, Gavin R. C.
    Steele, Robert J. C.
    Fraser, Callum G.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 60 (10) : 1496 - 1505
  • [9] Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for colorectal cancer in symptomatic primary care patients
    Hunt, N.
    Allcock, R.
    Myers, M.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 493 : S153 - S153
  • [10] Most participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening out of curiosity about their chances of developing cancer
    Denters, Maaike J.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Deutekom, Marije
    Fockens, Paul
    Dekker, Evelien
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (03) : 176 - 179