Disparities in postoperative complications and perioperative events based on insurance status following elective spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Kumar, Neerav [1 ]
Akosman, Izzet [1 ]
Mortenson, Richard [2 ]
Xu, Grace [3 ]
Kumar, Abhinav [4 ]
Mostafa, Evan [5 ]
Rivlin, Jessica [5 ]
Ramos, Rafael De La Garza [5 ]
Krystal, Jonathan [5 ]
Eleswarapu, Ananth [5 ]
Yassari, Reza [5 ]
Fourman, Mitchell S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA USA
[5] Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY USA
来源
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL | 2024年 / 17卷
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Disparities; Insurance; Payer status; Complications; Outcomes; Spine surgery; MORTALITY; RATES; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; FUSION; CARE; UNDERINSURANCE; STROKE; HEALTH; RACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100315
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Increasing evidence demonstrates disparities among patients with differing insurance statuses in the field of spine surgery. However, no pooled analyses have performed a robust review characterizing differences in postoperative outcomes among patients with varying insurance types. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the PUBMED, MEDLINE(R), ERIC, and EMBASE was performed for studies comparing postoperative outcomes in patients with private insurance versus government insurance. Pooled incidence rates and odds ratios were calculated for each outcome and meta-analyses were conducted for 3 perioperative events and 2 types of complications. In addition to pooled analysis, sub-analyses were performed for each outcome in specific government payer statuses. Results: Thirty-eight studies (5,018,165 total patients) were included. Compared with patients with private insurance, patients with government insurance experienced greater risk of 90-day re-admission (OR 1.84, p < .0001), non-routine discharge (OR 4.40, p < .0001), extended LOS (OR 1.82, p < .0001), any postoperative complication (OR 1.61, p < .0001), and any medical complication (OR 1.93, p < .0001). These differences persisted across outcomes in sub-analyses comparing Medicare or Medicaid to private insurance. Similarly, across all examined outcomes, Medicare patients had a higher risk of experiencing an adverse event compared with non-Medicare patients. Compared with Medicaid patients, Medicare patients were only more likely to experience non-routine discharge (OR 2.68, p = .0007). Conclusions: Patients with government insurance experience greater likelihood of morbidity across several perioperative outcomes. Additionally, Medicare patients fare worse than non-Medicare patients across outcomes, potentially due to age-based discrimination. Based on these results, it is clear that directed measures should be taken to ensure that underinsured patients receive equal access to resources and quality care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Medicaid and Medicare payer status are associated with worse surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology [J].
Ahmad, Tessnim R. ;
Chen, Lee-may ;
Chapman, Jocelyn S. ;
Chen, Lee-lynn .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 155 (01) :93-97
[2]  
Akosman I., nested knowledge
[3]   Insurance Status, Geography, Race, and Ethnicity as Predictors of Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery Rates and In-Hospital Mortality An Examination of United States Trends From 1992 to 2005 [J].
Alosh, Hassan ;
Riley, Lee H., III ;
Skolasky, Richard L. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (18) :1956-1962
[4]   Disparities in Elective Spine Surgery for Medicaid Beneficiaries: A Systematic Review [J].
Badin, Daniel ;
Ortiz-Babilonia, Carlos ;
Musharbash, Farah N. ;
Jain, Amit .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (02) :534-546
[5]  
Bashshur R, 1993, Med Care Rev, V50, P199, DOI 10.1177/107755879305000204
[6]   UNDERINSURANCE IN AMERICA [J].
BODENHEIMER, T .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (04) :274-278
[7]   ERAS implementation in an urban patient population undergoing gynecologic surgery [J].
Brown, Morgan L. ;
Simpson, Vidda ;
Clark, Annabelle B. ;
Matossian, Margarite D. ;
Holman, Stacey L. ;
Jernigan, Amelia Marie ;
Scheib, Stacey A. ;
Shank, Jessica ;
Key, Alison ;
Chapple, Andrew G. ;
Kelly, Elizabeth ;
Nair, Navya .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 85 :1-11
[8]   Sociodemographic Characteristics Predict Readmission Rates After Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery [J].
Chen, Stephanie A. ;
White, Robert S. ;
Tangel, Virginia ;
Nachamie, Anna S. ;
Witkin, Lisa R. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (02) :364-377
[9]   Association between compensation status and outcomes in spine surgery: a meta-analysis of 31 studies [J].
Cheriyan, Thomas ;
Harris, Bradley ;
Cheriyan, Jerry ;
Lafage, Virginie ;
Spivak, Jeffrey M. ;
Bendo, John A. ;
Errico, Thomas J. ;
Goldstein, Jeffrey A. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (12) :2564-2573
[10]   Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF [J].
Dial, Brian L. ;
Esposito, Valentine R. ;
Danilkowicz, Richard ;
O'Donnell, Jeffrey ;
Sugarman, Barrie ;
Blizzard, Daniel J. ;
Erickson, Melissa E. .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (03) :252-260