Expanding the Estimated Fetal Weight Definition of Growth Restriction by Adding Small Abdominal Circumference Prediction of Neonatal Morbidity

被引:0
|
作者
Shea, Ashley [1 ]
Battarbee, Ashley N. [1 ,2 ]
Grantz, Katherine L. [3 ]
He, Dian [3 ,4 ]
Owen, John [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Ctr Womens Reprod Hlth, 1700 6th Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Womens Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHHD, Epidemiol Branch, Div Populat Hlth Res, Div Intramural Res,NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Prospective Grp Inc, Fairfax, VA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
estimated fetal weight; fetal abdominal circumference; fetal growth restriction; neonatal morbidity; predictive value; small for gestational age; GESTATIONAL-AGE; BIRTH-WEIGHT; TERM; SINGLETONS; MORTALITY; BORN; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/jum.16683
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective-The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's (SMFM) diagnostic criteria for fetal growth restriction (FGR) recently added abdominal circumference (AC) <10th percentile to estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th percentile; however, its prediction of neonatal morbidity is unknown. Our objective was to compare the two definitions for their prediction of composite neonatal morbidity. Methods-Secondary analysis of the Fetal Growth Study-Singletons, 2009-2013. The last ultrasound (mean 36.9 +/- 2.3 weeks) was included from non-anomalous fetuses. Composite neonatal morbidity was the primary outcome: metabolic acidosis, neonatal intensive care unit stay >3 days, significant respiratory morbidities, seizures, hyperbilirubinemia requiring exchange transfusion, intrapartum aspiration, necrotizing enterocolitis, hypoglycemia, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, periventricular leukomalacia, sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, or neonatal death. The secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA). Logistic regression modeled the association of each FGR definition with outcomes, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) assessed predictive ability. Results-Of 2400 eligible individuals, 135 (5.6%) neonates had composite neonatal morbidity, and 245 (10%) were SGA. At the last ultrasound, 181 (7.5%) had FGR based on EFW alone (original definition) and 215 (9.0%) had FGR based on a small EFW or AC (expanded definition) (P < .0001). Both definitions had poor discrimination for composite neonatal morbidity (original: AUC 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.54; expanded: AUC 0.51, 95% CI, 0.48-0.54). Both had acceptable discrimination of SGA (original: AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.73; expanded: AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.68-0.75). Conclusions-Adding AC <10th percentile to the EFW <10th percentile definition of FGR significantly increased the incidence of FGR but did not improve the prediction of neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population. The SMFM guideline for FGR should be adopted with caution.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of adding abdominal circumference to the definition of fetal growth restriction
    Combs, C. Andrew
    Castillo, Ramon
    Webb, Gilbert W.
    del Rosario, Amber
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2021, 3 (04)
  • [2] Longitudinal Assessment of Abdominal Circumference versus Estimated Fetal Weight in the Detection of Late Fetal Growth Restriction
    Rahmat Basuki, Tri
    Caradeux, Javier
    Eixarch, Elisenda
    Gratacos, Eduard
    Figueras, Francesc
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2019, 45 (04) : 230 - 237
  • [3] Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Estimated Fetal Weight and Isolated Abdominal Circumference for the Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction
    Whitham, Megan D.
    Reynolds, David M.
    Urban, Amanda R.
    Ennen, Christopher S.
    Dudley, Donald J.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (02) : 477 - 485
  • [4] Comparing outcomes of fetal growth restriction defined by estimated fetal weight versus isolated abdominal circumference
    Griffin, Myah M.
    Mehta-Lee, Shilpi S.
    Penfield, Christina A.
    Roman, Ashley S.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (01) : 449 - 452
  • [5] Prediction of fetal growth restriction using estimated fetal weight vs a combined screening model in the third trimester
    Miranda, J.
    Rodriguez-Lopez, M.
    Triunfo, S.
    Sairanen, M.
    Kouru, H.
    Parra-Saavedra, M.
    Crovetto, F.
    Figueras, F.
    Crispi, F.
    Gratacos, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 603 - 611
  • [6] Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
    Leon-Martinez, Daisy
    Lundsberg, Lisbet S.
    Culhane, Jennifer
    Zhang, Jun
    Son, Moeun
    Reddy, Uma M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (06) : e1 - e16
  • [7] Defining fetal growth restriction: abdominal circumference as an alternative criterion
    Rad, Steve
    Beauchamp, S.
    Morales, C.
    Mirocha, J.
    Esakoff, T. F.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (23) : 3089 - 3094
  • [8] Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age
    Price, Corley Rachelle
    Roeckner, Jared
    Odibo, Linda
    Odibo, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (20) : 3931 - 3936
  • [9] Impact of Using Abdominal Circumference Independently in the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction
    Pressman, Katherine
    Odibo, Linda
    Duncan, Jose R.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (01) : 157 - 162
  • [10] Fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and prediction of small for gestational age at birth
    Doulaveris, Georgios
    Gallagher, Patience
    Romney, Elizabeth
    Richley, Michael
    Gebb, Juliana
    Rosner, Mara
    Dar, Pe'er
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (14) : 2415 - 2421