Role of the grey entrepreneur in startups: an empirical study of the impact of age diversity on innovation performance

被引:0
作者
Daisuke Kanama [1 ]
Shin Ito [2 ]
Sakura Muranaka [3 ]
Toshiya Watanabe [2 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Transdisciplinary Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kakumamachi, Ishikawa, Kanazawa
[2] Institute for Future Initiatives, University of Tokyo, Tokyo
[3] Institute of Transdisciplinary Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Age diversity; Entrepreneur; Innovation performance; Startup;
D O I
10.1186/s40008-025-00352-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study quantitatively examined the role of middle-aged and older professionals in innovation. Using data from 126 domestic startups obtained through a proprietary survey, we investigated the relationship between age diversity among startup founders and innovation performance. This study focuses on startup founders, offering a direct view of a firm’s growth process and distinguishing it from previous research that primarily addressed R&D and new business development in established firms. This focus allows a more explicit measurement of the relationship between founder diversity and innovation outcomes. The analysis revealed three key findings. First, many startup founders have a positive impact on business growth. Firms founded by multiple founders had higher gross sales than those with a single founder. Second, in scenarios with an increasing number of startup founders, an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between founder-age diversity and gross sales, suggesting that greater age diversity alone is insufficient. Instead, the optimal level of age diversity is a gap of approximately 20–30 years. Third, including founders in their 30 s was key to enhancing gross sales. Namely, having a core group of founders in their 30 s, supplemented by founders with more experience, increases the likelihood of achieving higher sales. © The Author(s) 2025.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Ahuja G., Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study, Adm Sci Q, 45, 3, pp. 425-455, (2000)
[2]  
Ali M., Ng Y.L., Kulik C.T., Board age and gender diversity: a test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions, J Bus Ethics, 125, pp. 497-512, (2014)
[3]  
Amabile T.M., How to kill creativity, Harvard Bus Rev, 76, 5, pp. 77-87, (1998)
[4]  
Anand R., Winters M.F., A retrospective view of corporate diversity training from 1964 to the present, Acad Manage Learn Educ, 7, 3, pp. 356-372, (2008)
[5]  
Antoncic B., Hisrich R.D., Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validation, J Bus Ventur, 16, 5, pp. 495-527, (2001)
[6]  
Artistico D., Cervone D., Pezzuti L., Perceived self-efficacy and everyday problem solving among young and older adults, Psychol Aging, 18, pp. 68-79, (2003)
[7]  
Baer M., Putting creativity to work: the implementation of creative ideas in organizations, Acad Manag J, 55, pp. 1102-1119, (2012)
[8]  
Baltes P.B., Staudinger U.M., Lindenberger U., Lifespan psychology: theory and application to intellectual functioning, Annu Rev Psychol, 50, pp. 471-507, (1999)
[9]  
Beechler S., Woodward I.C., The global “war for talent, J Int Manag, 15, 3, pp. 273-285, (2009)
[10]  
Bell S.T., Villado A.J., Lukasik M.A., Belau L., Briggs A.L., Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: a meta-analysis, J Manag, 37, pp. 709-743, (2011)