Türkiye's Relations with/within NATO: The Ontological Security Dilemmas of Türkiye's Transatlantic Identity

被引:0
作者
Akgul-Acikmese, Sinem [1 ]
Aksu, Fulya [2 ]
机构
[1] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Int Relat, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Altinbas Univ, Dept Int Relat, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
T & uuml; rkiye; ontological security; NATO; transatlantic identity; security dilemma; TURKEY;
D O I
10.1177/03043754241297762
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Since 1952, T & uuml;rkiye's Transatlantic identity has been largely shaped by its NATO membership and interactions with the Allies. During the Cold War, T & uuml;rkiye aligned its national interests and security concerns with NATO, making its membership a central element of its identity. However, starting in the 2000s, T & uuml;rkiye shifted toward a more independent foreign policy, influenced by its new activism and regional ambitions, particularly in the Middle East. This shift has caused tensions with NATO, especially considering T & uuml;rkiye's military interventions in Syria, its purchase of the S-400 missile defense system from Russia, and its reactions to the latest enlargement of NATO. This paper examines T & uuml;rkiye's evolving Transatlantic identity through the lens of ontological security, according to which states act in order to provide continuity in their identities (T & uuml;rkiye's Transatlantic identity) and to prevent any instabilities to feel ontologically secure, which then might create security dilemmas between the protective security cocoons (T & uuml;rkiye's NATO membership) and the crises with other actors (T & uuml;rkiye's clashes with/within NATO). In other words, this paper aims to understand how T & uuml;rkiye's Transatlantic identity is still valued, desired, and reconstructed, despite the security dilemmas of T & uuml;rkiye's contentions with/within the NATO Alliance, from the ontological security perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 67 条
[51]  
Oval A. ., 2024, Ankara niversitesi SBF Dergisi, V79, P137, DOI [10.33630/ausbf.1192846, DOI 10.33630/AUSBF.1192846]
[52]  
Ovali A.S., 2019, International Journal of Social Inquiry, V12, P155
[53]  
Parlar Dal E., 2014, Perceptions, V19, P107
[54]   Ontological Insecurity, Anxiety, and Hubris: An Affective Account of Turkey-KRG Relations [J].
Pusane, Ozlem Kayhan ;
Ilgit, Asli .
ULUSLARARASI ILISKILER-INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2022, 19 (73) :95-111
[55]   Ontological insecurity in asymmetric conflicts: Reflections on agonistic peace in Turkey's Kurdish issue [J].
Rumelili, Bahar ;
Celik, Ayse Betul .
SECURITY DIALOGUE, 2017, 48 (04) :279-296
[56]  
Saray M., 2000, Sovyet Tehdidi Karsnda Trkiye'nin NATOya Girii III. Cumhurbakan celal Bayar'n Hatralar ve Belgeler
[57]   Ontological security and the power of self-identity: British neutrality and the American Civil War [J].
Steele, BJ .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 31 (03) :519-540
[58]  
Steele BrentJ., 2008, Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State
[59]  
TBMM, 2014, Babakanlarmz ve Genel Kurul Konumalar, Cilt 9
[60]  
TBMM, 1952, About us