Collaborative discussions between GPs and pharmacists to optimise patient medication: a qualitative study within a UK primary care clinical trial

被引:1
作者
Parslow, Roxanne M. [1 ]
Duncan, Lorna J. [1 ]
Caddick, Barbara [1 ]
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A. [3 ]
Turner, Katrina [2 ]
Payne, Rupert A. [4 ]
Man, Cindy [1 ]
Guthrie, Bruce [5 ]
Blair, Peter S. [6 ]
McCahon, Deborah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Ctr Acad Primary Care CAPC, Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PN, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Ctr Acad Primary Care CAPC, Bristol Med Sch, Primary care, Bristol, England
[3] Keele Univ, Sch Med, Gen Res Practice, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Dept Hlth & Community Sci, Primary Care & Clin Pharmacol, Exeter, England
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Old Med Sch, Gen Practice, Edinburgh, Scotland
[6] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Epidemiol & Stat, Bristol, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
general practice; general practitioners; medication reviews; medicines optimisation; pharmacists; polypharmacy; qualitative; INTERVIEWS; BARRIERS; COST;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2024.0190
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background There has been significant investment in pharmacists working in UK general practice to improve the effective and safe use of medicines. However, evidence of how to optimise collaboration between GPs and pharmacists in the context of polypharmacy (multiple medication) is lacking. Aim To explore GP and pharmacist views and experiences of in-person, interprofessional collaborative discussions (IPCDs) as part of a complex intervention to optimise medication use for patients with polypharmacy in general practice. Design and setting A mixed-method process evaluation embedded within the Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP) trial conducted in Bristol and the West Midlands, between February 2021 and September 2023. Method Audio-recordings of IPCDs between GPs and pharmacists, along with individual semi-structured interviews to explore their reflections on these discussions, were used. All recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results A total of 14 practices took part in the process evaluation from February 2022 to September 2023; 17 IPCD meetings were audio-recorded, discussing 30 patients (range 1-6 patients per meeting). In all, six GPs and 13 pharmacists were interviewed. The IPCD was highly valued by GPs and pharmacists who described benefits, including: strengthening their working relationship; gaining in confidence to manage more complex patients; and learning from each other. It was often challenging, however, to find time for the IPCDs. Conclusion The model of IPCD used in this study provided protected time for GPs and pharmacists to work together to deliver whole-patient care, with both professions finding this beneficial. Protected time for interprofessional liaison and collaboration, and structured interventions may facilitate improved patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:E727 / E734
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Avery, Anthony J.
    Rodgers, Sarah
    Cantrill, Judith A.
    Armstrong, Sarah
    Cresswell, Kathrin
    Eden, Martin
    Elliott, Rachel A.
    Howard, Rachel
    Kendrick, Denise
    Morris, Caroline J.
    Prescott, Robin J.
    Swanwick, Glen
    Franklin, Matthew
    Putman, Koen
    Boyd, Matthew
    Sheikh, Aziz
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9823) : 1310 - 1319
  • [2] Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration between community pharmacists and general practitioners-A systematic review
    Bollen, Annelies
    Harrison, Reema
    Aslani, Parisa
    van Haastregt, Jolanda C. M.
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2019, 27 (04) : E189 - E212
  • [3] Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: an 11-year national analysis
    Bourgeois, Florence T.
    Shannon, Michael W.
    Valim, Clarissa
    Mandl, Kenneth D.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 (09) : 901 - 910
  • [4] Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
  • [5] The effectiveness and cost of integrating pharmacists within general practice to optimize prescribing and health outcomes in primary care patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review
    Croke, Aisling
    Cardwell, Karen
    Clyne, Barbara
    Moriarty, Frank
    McCullagh, Laura
    Smith, Susan M.
    [J]. BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2023, 24 (01):
  • [6] Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospital In-Patients: A Prospective Analysis of 3695 Patient-Episodes
    Davies, Emma C.
    Green, Christopher F.
    Taylor, Stephen
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Mottram, David R.
    Pirmohamed, Munir
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (02):
  • [7] Barriers and enablers to collaborative working between GPs and pharmacists: a qualitative interview study
    Duncan, Polly
    Ridd, Matthew J.
    McCahon, Deborah
    Guthrie, Bruce
    Cabral, Christie
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2020, 70 (692) : E155 - E163
  • [8] Efficiency versus thoroughness in medication review: a qualitative interview study in UK primary care
    Duncan, Polly
    Cabral, Christie
    McCahon, Deborah
    Guthrie, Bruce
    Ridd, Matthew J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (680) : E190 - E198
  • [9] Deprescribing: a primary care perspective
    Duncan, Polly
    Duerden, Martin
    Payne, Rupert A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2017, 24 (01) : 37 - U61
  • [10] A Systematic Review of Barriers to Medication Adherence in the Elderly: Looking Beyond Cost and Regimen Complexity
    Gellad, Walid F.
    Grenard, Jerry L.
    Marcum, Zachary A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 9 (01) : 11 - 23