Implementation Of New Mexico's 'No Behavioral Health Cost Sharing' Law: A Qualitative Study

被引:0
作者
Harris, Samantha J. [1 ]
Golberstein, Ezra [2 ]
Maclean, Johanna Catherine [3 ]
Stein, Bradley D. [4 ]
Ettner, Susan L. [5 ]
Saloner, Brendan [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] George Mason Univ, Arlington, VA USA
[4] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Corporation; Pittsburgh; Pennsylvania; EQUITY ACT EVALUATION; IMPACT; PARITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00101
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Out-of-pocket spending is a long-standing challenge for privately insured people. New Mexico passed the first US law prohibiting private insurers from applying cost sharing to behavioral health treatment, effective January 1, 2022. We examined the perceptions of key informants, including clinicians, insurers, and state officials, about implementing the No Behavioral Health Cost Sharing law to explore how it might affect downstream outcomes such as spending and access. The law was viewed favorably and implemented without much difficulty. Clinicians noted widespread positive impacts, particularly for those needing intensive treatment. However, they worried about workforce capacity and the exclusion of people covered under self-insured employer plans, which are exempt from state regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974. Insurers found the law to be in alignment with their organizational goals, but they expressed concern about the administrative burden caused by increased reviews of claims, and some were monitoring for unintended consequences (for example, waste and fraud) that could lead to increased premiums. Engagement strategies were needed to inform eligible members and facilitate enrollment in eligible plans. The law provides a potential model for states to improve access to behavioral health care, but impacts may be limited by factors such as workforce, awareness, and federal ERISA constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:1448 / 1454
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   Federal Parity and Spending for Mental Illness [J].
Kennedy-Hendricks, Alene ;
Epstein, Andrew J. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. ;
Haffajee, Rebecca L. ;
McGinty, Emma E. ;
Busch, Alisa B. ;
Huskamp, Haiden A. ;
Barry, Colleen L. .
PEDIATRICS, 2018, 142 (02)
[12]  
KFF, Share of private-sector enrollees enrolled in self-insured plans
[13]  
KFF, 2024, Medicaid Enrollment and Unwinding Tracker
[14]  
KFF, 2023, Medicaid state fact sheets
[15]  
New Mexico Health Care Authority, Human Services Department announces the end of Medicaid continuous coverage federal requirement
[16]  
New Mexico Legislature, 2021, Senate Bill 317: No Behavioral Health Cost Sharing
[17]  
New Mexico Legislature, 2023, Senate Bill 273, Health Insurance Mental Health Coverage
[18]  
Pitsor J., 2023, NATL C STATE LEGISLA
[19]   Access And Cost Barriers To Mental Health Care, By Insurance Status, 1999-2010 [J].
Rowan, Kathleen ;
McAlpine, Donna D. ;
Blewett, Lynn A. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2013, 32 (10) :1723-1730
[20]  
Spiegel J., 2022, Recent trends in patient out-of-pocket cost sharing: issue brief 564