ESG components and equity returns: Evidence from real estate investment trusts

被引:1
作者
Fan, Kwok Yuen [1 ]
Shen, Jianfu [2 ]
Hui, Eddie C. M. [3 ]
Cheng, Louis T. W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ Hong Kong Baptist Univ United, Dept Finance, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hum Hong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Int Affairs, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Hang Seng Univ Hong Kong, Dept Econ & Finance, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
ESG; Environmental performance; Social performance; Governance performance; Equity return; Firm fundamental; Institutional ownership; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; REIT INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP; LEED-CERTIFIED BUILDINGS; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; FIRM VALUE; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; CROSS-SECTION; GOOD DEEDS; RISK; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103716
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the relationships between the individual components of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and future stock returns of US Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). The findings demonstrate a negative association between environmental performance and expected returns, while social performance shows a positive relationship with future returns. Moreover, the study investigates whether the observed negative (positive) relationship between environmental (social) performance and equity returns can be attributed to the predictability of ESG components on future firm fundamentals or investor preferences towards different ESG components. The results indicate that environmental performance has a detrimental impact on firm fundamentals in REITs, including future profits, external financing, and stock risk. Conversely, social performance exhibits a positive association with future firm fundamentals. Institutional investors do not significantly reduce ownership to REITs with strong environmental performance but increase their ownership of REITs with strong social performance. In summary, this study highlights that the relationship between ESG and equity varies depending on the specific ESG components under consideration.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [91] Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy
    Masulis, Ronald W.
    Reza, Syed Walid
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2015, 28 (02) : 592 - 636
  • [92] Limited impacts of carbon tax rebate programmes on public support for carbon pricing
    Mildenberger, Matto
    Lachapelle, Erick
    Harrison, Kathryn
    Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (02) : 141 - +
  • [93] Miller N., 2008, J REAL ESTATE PORTFO, V14, P385, DOI DOI 10.1080/10835547.2008.12089822
  • [94] Positive and Negative Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Leverage, and Idiosyncratic Risk
    Mishra, Saurabh
    Modi, Sachin B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 117 (02) : 431 - 448
  • [95] NAREIT, 2022, Nareit's REIT industry ESG report 2022
  • [96] HYPOTHESIS-TESTING WITH EFFICIENT METHOD OF MOMENTS ESTIMATION
    NEWEY, WK
    WEST, KD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1987, 28 (03) : 777 - 787
  • [97] Business sustainability factors and stock price informativeness
    Ng, Anthony C.
    Rezaee, Zabihollah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 64
  • [98] Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility
    Nofsinger, John R.
    Sulaeman, Johan
    Varma, Abhishek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2019, 58 : 700 - 725
  • [99] Finance, investment and investment performance: Evidence from the REIT sector
    Ott, SH
    Riddiough, TJ
    Yi, HC
    [J]. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2005, 33 (01) : 203 - 235
  • [100] Sustainable investing in equilibrium
    Pastor, L'ubos
    Stambaugh, Robert F.
    Taylor, Lucian A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 142 (02) : 550 - 571