A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Alzahrani, Meshal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Broadbent, David A. [2 ,3 ]
Teh, Irvin [3 ]
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar [2 ]
Johnstone, Emily [4 ]
Speight, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Appl Med Sci, Dept Radiol Sci, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Leeds, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Leeds, England
[4] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Christie Med Phys & Engn, Manchester, England
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 33卷
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiotherapy; MRI in RT; Quality assurance; ACR phantom; Multimodal anthropomorphic phantom; IMPLEMENTATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2025.100707
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy (RT) simulation has grown, prompting quality assurance (QA) guidelines by the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). This study compares a novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom to an American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom for a subset of these MRI-specific QA tests in RT. Materials and methods: A novel 3D-printed multimodality head-and-neck anthropomorphic phantom was compared to an ACR large MRI phantom. IPEM and AAPM-recommended QA tests were conducted, including informatics/connectivity/data transfer, MRI-CT registration, end-to-end QA, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/ percentage integral uniformity (PIU) assessments using RT accessories. Results: Both phantoms were suitable for informatics/connectivity/data transfer. In MRI-CT registration, no errors were found; the ACR phantom offered more quantitative landmarks, while the anthropomorphic phantom provided limited structures. Both phantoms achieved target registration errors (TREs) below 0.97 mm and dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values above 0.9, meeting guidelines. For end-to-end QA, the anthropomorphic phantom facilitated dose measurements of 1.994 Gy versus a calculated 2.01 Gy (-0.8 %). SNR and PIU assessments showed higher values in radiology setups compared to RT setups for both phantoms. Conclusions: Multimodality anthropomorphic phantoms compatible with dosimetric equipment allow realistic end-to-end QA, unlike the ACR phantom. While the ACR phantom is suitable for informatics and MRI-CT registration, anthropomorphic phantoms better represent clinical scenarios. For comprehensive QA, both ACR and anthropomorphic phantoms are required. Additionally, large field-of-view (FOV) phantoms are crucial for evaluating large FOV MRI distortions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] A novel anthropomorphic multimodality phantom for MRI-based radiotherapy quality assurance testing
    Singhrao, Kamal
    Fu, Jie
    Wu, Holden H.
    Hu, Peng
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Chin, Robert K.
    Lewis, John H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (04) : 1443 - 1451
  • [2] Sensitivity analysis of different quality assurance methods for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
    Adjeiwaah, Mary
    Garpebring, Anders
    Nyholm, Tufve
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 : 21 - 27
  • [3] Quality assurance of magnetic resonance imaging for a polymer gel dosimeter using a 3D-printed phantom
    Tachibana, Hidenobu
    Hoshino, Yoshihiko
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Usui, Keisuke
    Mizukami, Shinya
    Shibukawa, Shuhei
    Kodama, Takashi
    Tachibana, Rie
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2025, 226
  • [4] Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning
    Wyatt, Jonathan J.
    McCallum, Hazel M.
    Maxwell, Ross J.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 22 : 28 - 35
  • [5] Quality assurance measurements of geometric accuracy for magnetic resonance imaging-based radiotherapy treatment planning
    Ranta, Iiro
    Kemppainen, Reko
    Keyrilainen, Jani
    Suilamo, Sami
    Heikkinen, Samuli
    Kapanen, Mika
    Saunavaara, Jani
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 62 : 47 - 52
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging quality control, quality assurance and quality improvement
    Sreedher, Gayathri
    Ho, Mai-Lan
    Smith, Mark
    Udayasankar, Unni K.
    Risacher, Seretha
    Rapalino, Otto
    Greer, Mary-Louise C.
    Doria, Andrea S.
    Gee, Michael S.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (05) : 698 - 708
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging quality control, quality assurance and quality improvement
    Gayathri Sreedher
    Mai-Lan Ho
    Mark Smith
    Unni K. Udayasankar
    Seretha Risacher
    Otto Rapalino
    Mary-Louise C. Greer
    Andrea S. Doria
    Michael S. Gee
    Pediatric Radiology, 2021, 51 : 698 - 708
  • [8] An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
    Sohn, James J.
    Lim, Sara
    Das, Indra J.
    Yadav, Poonam
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 27
  • [9] SEMIAUTOMATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR QUANTITATIVE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    BARKER, GJ
    TOFTS, PS
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1992, 10 (04) : 585 - 595
  • [10] Development and validation of a novel large field of view phantom and a software module for the quality assurance of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Hammoud, Rabih
    McGarry, Maeve
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    Perkins, Gregory
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 33 (07) : 939 - 949