Promoting sustainable land management: An innovative approach to land-take decision-making

被引:1
作者
Gupta, Pranav [1 ]
Bharat, Alka [1 ]
Mccullen, Nick [2 ]
Kershaw, Tristan [2 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Natl Inst Technol, Inst Natl Importance, Dept Architecture & Planning, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Bath, England
关键词
Land-take; Decision-making; Sustainable urban development; Loss and damage analysis; Scenario building; Natural resources management; FUZZY-AHP; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; URBAN; MODEL; URBANIZATION; EXPANSION; GREEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107419
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land degradation presents significant global challenges, threatening natural resources, biodiversity, and food security. Addressing this issue requires more effective land-take decision-making processes, particularly in data- deficient cities where comprehensive land assessment methods are challenging to implement. This study introduces a streamlined land-take decision-making framework designed to promote sustainable land management practices. The framework consists of two key components: the Sustainable Development Index (SDI) for assessing current land-take decisions and the Decision-Making Rubric (DMR) for proposing mitigated solutions. Applied to a pilot case city in India, the framework demonstrated its practical utility by showing that land-take decisions between 2001 and 2021 resulted in a 69 % reduction of natural land cover. If these trends continue, the assessment of the 2031 master plan using SDI indicates that an additional 56 % of the remaining ecosystem-rich areas, which include regions with high biodiversity and ecological value, could be lost by 2031. However, the framework's application could potentially mitigate these impacts, reducing the projected 56 % loss to 14 %, thereby promoting more sustainable and equitable land management practices. The study's aim is to provide decision-makers with a practical tool to improve land identification methods and enhance the sustainability of land-take decisions. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by addressing the gap in practical, easily applicable tools for sustainable land management in data-deficient urban contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 112 条
[11]   No perfect tools: Trade-offs of sustainability principles and user requirements in designing support tools for land-use decisions between greenfields and brownfields [J].
Bartke, Stephan ;
Schwarze, Reimund .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 153 :11-24
[12]  
Batty M., 1999, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, V23, P205, DOI 10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00015-0
[13]  
Bencardino M., 2015, B SOC GEOL ITAL, VVIII, P217, DOI [10.13128/bsgi.v8i2.339, DOI 10.13128/BSGI.V8I2.339]
[14]  
Bharath H.A., 2016, KER ENV C KEC 2016, P117
[15]   Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability [J].
Bibri, Simon Elias ;
Krogstie, John ;
Karrholm, Mattias .
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 4
[16]   GIS Spatial Analysis Modeling for Land Use Change. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Intellectual Base and Trends [J].
Bielecka, Elzbieta .
GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 10 (11) :1-21
[17]   Cronbach's alpha [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) :572-572
[18]   Green City Concept and a Method to Measure Green City Performance over Time Applied to Fifty Cities Globally: Influence of GDP, Population Size and Energy Efficiency [J].
Brilhante, Ogenis ;
Klaas, Jannes .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06)
[19]  
BRUEGMANN R., 2015, International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences, V2nd, P934, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.74061-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.74061-X]
[20]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247