Arterial Stiffness as a New Predictor of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Polycythemia Vera

<bold>Background:</bold> Thrombotic adverse events and disease progression are crucial in Polycythemia Vera (PV), as it stands as the leading cause of mortality. The pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a valuable indicator of arterial aging and often plays a significant independent role in contributing to cardiovascular adverse events (CV-AEs). The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between PWV and critical vascular function parameters, with the goal of identifying new predictive factors of vascular damage and exploring a potential connection with disease progression. <bold>Methods:</bold> Non-invasive aortic stiffness was assessed through carotid-femoral PWV measurement. PWV was measured using the SphygmoCor device. History of arterial or venous thrombosis (TAEs) or other CV-AEs was collected at baseline. PWV measurements were repeated at baseline, at 6 and at 12 months. <bold>Results:</bold> The study involved 28 PV patients aged 27 to 77 years, with 57.1% being male. Fourteen patients (50%) reported a high-risk thrombotic score at diagnosis, and 60.7% had at least one comorbidity. Multivariable regression models showed that hemoglobin levels were independently associated with PWV (beta: 0.68, SE 0.24, p < 0.01). During the follow-up period (median duration 21.3 months, range 6-33), a total of 13 events were documented. Specifically, two patients exhibited a loss of response to treatment, four patients presented an increase in spleen diameters, three patients displayed an escalation of systemic symptoms, and three patients had a clear progression to secondary myelofibrosis. PWV (per 1 m/s: OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00-2.91, p = 0.047) and leukocyte count (per 1 x 10(3)/mu L: OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.09, p = 0.043) were significant predictors of events, independently of waist circumference, blood pressure, treatment, and hematocrit. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> PWV has demonstrated its potential as an effective tool for monitoring PV patients. It stands as a clinical parameter that can predict the risk of progression in PV patients. Further investigation is essential to fully explore this potential. If successful, it could offer clinicians a valuable resource for effectively managing PV patients.