Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes

被引:1
作者
Weinstein, Marc A. [1 ,2 ]
Ayala, Giovanni A. [3 ]
Roura, Raul [3 ]
Christmas, Kaitlyn N. [3 ]
Warren, Deborah H. [3 ]
Simon, Peter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Morsani Sch Med, 13330 USF Laurel Dr, Tampa, FL USA
[2] Florida Orthopaed Inst, 13020 Telecom Prkw N, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Fdn Orthopaed Res & Educ, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607 USA
来源
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL | 2023年 / 16卷
关键词
Expandable cage; TLIF; Lumbar interbody fusion; Radiographic parameters; Back pain; Lumbar lordosis; Segmental lordosis; CAGE; LORDOSIS; SUBSIDENCE; RESTORATION; TECHNOLOGY; SPACERS; DISTRACTION; DISABILITY; ANTERIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of interbody cages as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusion remains an important technique to enhance segmental stability, promote solid arthrodesis, maintain neuroforaminal decompression, and preserve/improve segmental lordosis. Appropriate segmental lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance is well-known to be critical for long-term patient outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of TLIF in patients using an articulating, expandable cage. Primary endpoint was clinical and radiographic outcomes, including complications, at 12 and 24 months. Methods: A total of 37 patients underwent open single-level or 2-level TLIF by a single surgeon using an expandable cage with concomitant bilateral pedicle screws and posterolateral arthrodesis. Clinical outcomes included ODI and VAS for back and legs. Radiographic outcomes included pelvic incidence and tilt, lumbar and segmental lordoses, and disc height at the operative level(s). All outcomes were collected at baseline, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postop. Results: A total of 28 patients were available for analysis. Nine patients failed to follow-up at 24 months. Mean ODI scores showed significant improvement, from pre-to-postoperative at 24 months (55%; p<.0001). VAS for back and legs was significantly lower at 24 months on average by 72 and 79%, respectively (p<.0001 for both). Both segmental and lumbar lordoses significantly improved by 5.3 degrees and 4.2 degrees (p<.0001 and p=.049), respectively. Average disc height improved by 49% or 6.1 mm (p<.001). No device-related complications nor instances of measured subsidence. One patient had a superficial infection, and another had an intraoperatively repaired incidental durotomy. Conclusions: The use of an expandable cage contributed to improvement in both segmental and lumbar lordosis with no reported complications at 24-month follow-up. All clinical measures significantly improved as well. The expandable cage design represents an effective and safe option to increase cage size and allow significant segmental lordosis correction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters
    Hawasli, Ammar H.
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Chatrath, Ajay
    Yarbrough, Chester K.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2017, 43 (02)
  • [42] Failure of a polyether-ether-ketone expandable interbody cage following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Stein, Isaac C.
    Than, Khoi D.
    Chen, Kevin S.
    Wang, Anthony C.
    Park, Paul
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 : S555 - S559
  • [43] Failure of a polyether-ether-ketone expandable interbody cage following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Isaac C. Stein
    Khoi D. Than
    Kevin S. Chen
    Anthony C. Wang
    Paul Park
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 555 - 559
  • [44] How Does Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Influence Lumbar Radiologic Parameters?
    Pereira, Claudia
    Silva, Pedro Santos
    Cunha, Marisa
    Vaz, Rui
    Pereira, Paulo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 : E895 - E902
  • [45] Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Versus Bilateral Interbody Cages
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Rush, Augustus J., III
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Singh, Kern
    NEUROSPINE, 2021, 18 (04) : 854 - 862
  • [46] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Tang, Hao
    Guan, Xuemei
    Jiang, Fugui
    Xu, Neng
    Ju, Wen
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Li, Ming
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 21 - 26
  • [47] The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Min, Sang-Hyuk
    Yoo, Jae-Sung
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (05) : 1164 - 1172
  • [48] The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Sang-Hyuk Min
    Jae-Sung Yoo
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 1164 - 1172
  • [49] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558
  • [50] Radiographic Factors Affecting Lordosis Correction After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Unilateral Facetectomy
    Martin, Christopher T.
    Niu, Shuo
    Whicker, Emily
    Ward, Laura
    Yoon, S. Tim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (05) : 681 - 686