An analysis of trust governance mechanism in airline-airport relationship with resource dependence theory and transaction cost theory perspectives

被引:0
作者
Lapcin, Hilal Tugce [1 ]
Tasci, Deniz [2 ]
机构
[1] Samsun Univ, Civil Aviat High Sch, Ballica Campus, TR-55420 Ondokuzmayis, Samsun, Turkiye
[2] Anadolu Univ, Fac Commun Sci, Yunus Emre Campus, TR-26100 Tepebasi, Eskisehir, Turkiye
关键词
Trust governance mechanism; Transaction cost theory; Resource dependence theory; Multiple case study; Airline-airport relationship; FAMILIARITY BREED TRUST; INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS; BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS; POWER IMBALANCE; ALLIANCES; ECONOMICS; INTERDEPENDENCE; DETERMINANTS; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.10.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Developments have transformed airport operations into more commercially focused centers in the airport sector. This situation has raised the question of how to execute interdependent airport-airline relationships. In interdependent relationships, trust-based governance is the least costly governance structure and is crucial for fostering cooperation in long-term relationships. Trust-based governance is a management approach where relationships and decisions are guided by mutual trust, transparency, and collaboration between parties. When considering the nature of the relationship, it is observed that environmental uncertainty and asset specificity are high. Transaction cost theory suggests that trust governance mechanisms can be the least costly governance structure under high uncertainty and asset specificity. Similarly, resource dependency theory indicates that in situations with high environmental uncertainty, dependencies can be managed through trust governance mechanisms. Therefore, this study analyzes the trust governance mechanism in airport-airline relationships. Drawing from the perspectives of resource dependency theory and transaction cost theory, this research analyzes the trust governance mechanism in airport-airline relationships using case studies of Turkish Airlines and Istanbul Airport relationship is governed by contract-based trust, while the Pegasus Airlines and Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen Airport relationship is based on goodwill-based trust. It can be argued that the history of the airportairline relationship and the belief in the continuity of the relationship have a positive impact on trust.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 374
页数:16
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Adiloglu Yalcinkaya L., 2019, The Effects of Institutional Elements and Resource Dependencies on Airline Business Model Changes: Examples from Turkish Airlines Inc. And Pegasus Airlines Inc
[2]  
Adobor H., 2006, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, V27, P537, DOI [10.1108/01437730610692407, DOI 10.1108/01437730610692407]
[3]   What Drives Importer Opportunism? Learning from a Developing Country in Latin America [J].
Ahamed, A. F. M. Jalal ;
Stump, Rodney L. ;
Noboa, Fabrizio .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MARKETING, 2021, 34 (02) :146-164
[4]   Strategic alliances between airlines and airports - theoretical assessment and practical evidence [J].
Albers, S ;
Koch, B ;
Ruff, C .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2005, 11 (02) :49-58
[5]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Scandinavian Journal of Management, DOI [10.1016/S0956-5221(97)84644-1, DOI 10.1016/S0956-5221(97)84644-1]
[7]  
Asanuma B., 1989, J. Jpn. Int. Econ., V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/0889-1583(89)90029-4
[8]   Inter-personal and inter-organizational trust in business relationships: An attitude-behavior-outcome model [J].
Ashnai, Bahar ;
Henneberg, Stephan C. ;
Naude, Peter ;
Francescucci, Anthony .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 :128-139
[9]  
Axelrod R., 1984, The evolution of cooperation, DOI [10.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n2p208, DOI 10.5433/2178-8189.2021V25N2P208]
[10]   Low-cost airlines, secondary airports, and state aid: An economic assessment of the Ryanair-Charleroi Airport agreement [J].
Barbot, Cristina .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2006, 12 (04) :197-203