Urinary DNA Methylation Test for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis

被引:2
作者
Jeong, In Gab [1 ]
Yun, Sung-Cheol [2 ]
Ha, Hong Koo [3 ]
Kang, Sung Gu [4 ]
Lee, Sangchul [5 ]
Park, Sungchan [6 ]
Sung, Hyun Hwan [7 ]
Kim, Sun Il [8 ]
Hwang, Eu Chang [9 ]
Moon, Kyung Cheol [10 ]
Kwak, Cheol [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Coll Med, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Div Biostat, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Busan, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Anam Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seongnam, South Korea
[6] Univ Ulsan, Dept Urol, Ulsan Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Ulsan, South Korea
[7] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Suwon, South Korea
[9] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Urol, Med Sch, Gwangju, South Korea
[10] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[11] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; BIOMARKERS; SURVEILLANCE; ACCURACY; CYTOLOGY; GRADE;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.6160
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Importance: An accurate noninvasive biomarker test is needed for the early diagnosis of bladder cancer. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a urinary DNA methylation test (PENK methylation) and compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test or urine cytology test. Design, setting, and participants: In this prospective multicenter study at 10 sites in the Republic of Korea, individuals 40 years and older with hematuria undergoing cystoscopy within 3 months between March 11, 2022, and May 30, 2024, participated. The study participants were evaluated for bladder cancer using a urinary DNA methylation test. Exposure: Urinary DNA methylation test, NMP22 test, and urine cytology test. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of the urinary DNA methylation test for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer. Secondary objectives included the accuracy of the test for overall bladder cancer (all stages and grades) and the comparison of sensitivities and specificities for bladder cancer between the urinary DNA methylation test and the NMP22 test or urine cytology test. Results: Among the 1099 participants, 614 (55.9%) were male; participants had a mean (SD) age of 65 (10) years. Of the 1099 participants, 219 and 176 participants had bladder cancer and high-grade or invasive bladder cancer, respectively. The urinary DNA methylation test had sensitivity and specificity for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer of 89.2% (95% CI, 84.6%-93.8%) and 87.8% (95% CI, 85.6%-89.9%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for overall bladder cancer were 78.1% (95% CI, 72.6%-83.6%) and 88.8% (95% CI, 86.7%-90.8%), respectively. The positive predictive value for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer was 61.3% (95% CI, 55.4%-67.3%), and the negative predictive value was 97.6% (95% CI, 96.6%-98.7%). In comparison with the NMP22 test or urine cytology test, the urinary DNA methylation test showed significantly superior sensitivity for high-grade or invasive bladder cancer and overall bladder cancer. Conclusions and relevance: In this prospective multicenter study of individuals with hematuria, the urinary DNA methylation test showed 89% sensitivity for detecting high-grade or invasive bladder cancer, outperforming the NMP22 test or urine cytology test with high specificity. While this test had an excellent negative predictive value, its positive predictive value was suboptimal.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 299
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   BladMetrix: a novel urine DNA methylation test with high accuracy for detection of bladder cancer in hematuria patients [J].
Pharo, Heidi Dietrichson ;
Jeanmougin, Marine ;
Ager-Wick, Eirill ;
Vedeld, Hege Marie ;
Sorbo, Anne Klara ;
Dahl, Christina ;
Larsen, Louise Katrine ;
Honne, Hilde ;
Brandt-Winge, Sara ;
Five, May-Britt ;
Monteiro-Reis, Sara ;
Henrique, Rui ;
Jeronimo, Carmen ;
Steven, Kenneth ;
Wahlqvist, Rolf ;
Guldberg, Per ;
Lind, Guro Elisabeth .
CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2022, 14 (01)
[22]   Screening and monitoring for bladder cancer: Refining the use of NMP22 [J].
Ponsky, LE ;
Sharma, S ;
Pandrangi, L ;
Kedia, S ;
Nelson, D ;
Agarwal, A ;
Zippe, CD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) :75-78
[23]   Epigenetic Alterations in Bladder Cancer [J].
Porten, Sima P. .
CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 19 (12)
[24]  
Reid MD, 2012, INT J CLIN EXP PATHO, V5, P882
[25]   Cancer statistics, 2020 [J].
Siegel, Rebecca L. ;
Miller, Kimberly D. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2020, 70 (01) :7-30
[26]  
Sullivan PS, 2010, AM J TRANSL RES, V2, P412
[27]   Urinary markers for bladder cancer diagnosis: A review of current status and future challenges [J].
Tomiyama, Eisuke ;
Fujita, Kazutoshi ;
Hashimoto, Mamoru ;
Uemura, Hirotsugu ;
Nonomura, Norio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) :208-219
[28]   Evaluation of an Epigenetic Profile for the Detection of Bladder Cancer in Patients with Hematuria [J].
van Kessel, Kim E. M. ;
Van Neste, Leander ;
Lurkin, Irene ;
Zwarthoff, Ellen C. ;
Van Criekinge, Wim .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (03) :601-607
[29]   Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models [J].
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Elkin, Elena B. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2006, 26 (06) :565-574
[30]   Performance of the Bladder EpiCheck™ Methylation Test for Patients Under Surveillance for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Blinded Clinical Trial [J].
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Morote, Juan ;
Cornel, Erik B. ;
Gakis, Georgios ;
van Valenberg, F. Johannes P. ;
Lozano, Fernando ;
Sternberg, Itay A. ;
Willemsen, Ellen ;
Hegemann, Miriam L. ;
Paitan, Yossi ;
Leibovitch, Ilan .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (04) :307-313