Disentangling the Pros and Cons of Flexible Work Arrangements: Curvilinear Effects on Individual and Organizational Outcomes

被引:0
作者
Petitta, Laura [1 ]
Ghezzi, Valerio [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Psychol, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
flexible work orientation; curvilinear effects; well-being; productivity; organizational factors; FAMILY CONFLICT; JOB-SATISFACTION; FLEXIBILITY; COMMITMENT; IMPACT; CONSEQUENCES; LIFE; TELEWORKING; VALIDATION; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.3390/economies13010020
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The use of flexible work arrangements (e.g., remote, hybrid) has spread during the pandemic and cumulative studies provide mixed findings on the positive vs. negative consequences of these working methods for employees and organizations. The present study examined the potentially curvilinear effects of employees' attitude towards flexible work options (i.e., flexible work orientation; FWO) on individual- (i.e., performance, job satisfaction, stress, work-to-family conflict, family-to-work conflict) and organization-related outcomes (i.e., organizational social support, organizational justice, affective organizational commitment). Anonymous survey data were collected in 2021 from 1061 in-person and flexible workers nested within 100 Italian organizations. Measurement invariance across the two subsamples was supported and subsequent structural model analyses suggested a differential pattern of results for in-person and flexible workers. Results indicated a curvilinear U-shaped relationship between FWO and organizational support, justice, commitment and job satisfaction for the in-person subsample as compared to a positive linear relationship for flexible workers. Moreover, in both samples of flexible and in-presence workers, FWO exerted a positive linear effect on performance and a mainly negative linear effect on stress, WFC and FWC. Overall, flexible workers displayed linear relationships among all the study variables, whereas in-person workers showed the curvilinear effects of FWO on support, justice, commitment and satisfaction, all of which increased at high levels of employees' positive attitude towards FWO. Results are discussed in light of the globally elevated rates of flexible work arrangements and mixed findings on their implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 154 条
  • [1] Evidence-based practice implementation: The impact of public versus private sector organization type on organizational support, provider attitudes, and adoption of evidence-based practice
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    Sommerfeld, David H.
    Walrath-Greene, Christine M.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [2] Albion M.J., 2004, Australian Journal of Management, V29, P275
  • [3] THE MEASUREMENT AND ANTECEDENTS OF AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION
    ALLEN, NJ
    MEYER, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 63 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [4] How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings
    Allen, Tammy D.
    Golden, Timothy D.
    Shockley, Kristen M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2015, 16 (02) : 40 - 68
  • [5] Mixture Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling: A Novel Method for Comparing Structural Relations Across Many Groups
    Alonso, Andres F. Perez
    Rosseel, Yves
    Vermunt, Jeroen K.
    De Roover, Kim
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2024,
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, Work - life balance and flexible working arrangements in the European Union
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2020, Eurostat
  • [8] [Anonymous], Due to the difference in scales, statistical methods, and the choice of ecosystem traits or processes (Kannenberg et al., 2020), it is difficult to compare our recovery time directly with findings of other large-scale studies such as the work of Schwalm et al. (2012) and Yu et al. (2017). These two studies have yielded differing conclusions about the length and spatial pattern of recovery time at a global scale, as a result of their difference in the selection of drought indicator
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, ORG EC COOPERATION D, DOI 10.1787/a1568975-en
  • [10] [Anonymous], Some employees are destroying value, others are building it: Do you know the difference?