Examining the relationship between perceived bikeability, cycling preferences and cycling distance

被引:0
|
作者
Qi, Cong [1 ,2 ]
De Vos, Jonas [2 ]
Guo, Xiucheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Transportat, 2 Dongnandaxue Rd, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[2] UCL, Bartlett Sch Planning, 14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England
关键词
Perceived bikeability; Cycling; Preferences; Cross-Lagged Panel Models; Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Models; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; MODE CHOICE; ATTITUDES; PANEL; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTION; BEHAVIOR; CONTEXT; WALKING; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2025.104620
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding cycling behaviour is crucial for transport sustainability and individual health. Existing research has primarily focused on objectively measured bikeability using cross-sectional data, which are unable to assess within-person effects over time. Using longitudinal data from the Netherlands Mobility Panel, this paper applies a Cross-Lagged Panel Model and a RandomIntercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model to analyse the causal relationship between perceived bikeability, cycling preferences and cycling distance. The results show that individuals' cycling preferences and distance are relatively stable over time with positive autoregressive effects. Higher perceived bikeability and cycling distance directly encourage individual cycling distances and preferences separately in the subsequent year, with cross-lagged effects. For between-person effects, people with higher perceived bikeability generally have stronger cycling preferences and cycle longer distances. The Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model provides a superior model fit to separate within-person from between-person effects. These findings are valuable for promoting cycling.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Differences in parental perceptions of walking and cycling to high school according to distance
    Mandic, Sandra
    Hopkins, Debbie
    Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia
    Flaherty, Charlotte
    Coppell, Kirsten
    Moore, Antoni
    Williams, John
    Spence, John C.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 71 (71) : 238 - 249
  • [23] Relationship Between Jump Capacity and Performance in BMX Cycling
    Robert, Pau
    Cirer-Sastre, Rafel
    Lopez-Laval, Isaac
    Matas-Garcia, Sergi
    Alvarez-Herms, Jesus
    Julia-Sanchez, Sonia
    Corbi, Francisco
    APUNTS EDUCACION FISICA Y DEPORTES, 2020, (140): : 37 - 43
  • [24] Integrating perceptions of safety and bicycle theft risk in the analysis of cycling infrastructure preferences
    Marquez, Luis
    Soto, Jose J.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 150 : 285 - 301
  • [25] Conscious distance monitoring and perceived exertion in light-deprived cycling time trial
    Pinheiro, Fabiano A.
    Santos, Tony M.
    Pires, Flavio O.
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2016, 165 : 211 - 216
  • [26] Walking, cycling and the urban form: A Heckman selection model of active travel mode and distance by young adolescents
    Kaplan, Sigal
    Nielsen, Thomas Alexander Sick
    Prato, Carlo Giacomo
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 44 : 55 - 65
  • [27] Cycling provision separated from motor traffic: a systematic review exploring whether stated preferences vary by gender and age
    Aldred, Rachel
    Elliott, Bridget
    Woodcock, James
    Goodman, Anna
    TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2017, 37 (01) : 29 - 55
  • [28] How Cycling is Perceived in Budapest Based on Household Survey Results
    Matrai, Tamas
    Toth, Janos
    Cruz, Julio
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 64 (02): : 474 - 484
  • [29] Older adults' environmental preferences for transportation cycling
    Van Cauwenberg, Jelle
    De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
    Clarys, Peter
    De Geus, Bas
    Deforche, Benedicte
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2019, 13 : 185 - 199
  • [30] The nonlinear impact of cycling environment on bicycle distance: A perspective combining objective and perceptual dimensions
    Zhang, Yantang
    Hu, Xiaowei
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE, 2024, 17 (01) : 241 - 267