Speech recognition and real-ear-measured amplification in hearing-aid users with various grades of hearing loss

被引:0
作者
Engler, Max [1 ]
Digeser, Frank [1 ]
Hoppe, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Audiol, ENT Clin, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
DSL v5.0; hearing aid; NAL-NL2; real-ear measurement; speech recognition; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; MODERATELY SEVERE; PRESCRIPTION; NAL-NL1; PERFORMANCE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2024.2426009
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe relationship between aided speech recognition and hearing-aid (HA) amplification was investigated in a retrospective study.Design and study samplePure-tone thresholds, aided and unaided speech recognition and real-ear measurements of 635 ears in 374 HA users were reviewed. Ears were classified according to pure-tone average (PTA) and real-ear aided response (REAR) in relation to the targets of NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0.ResultsFor DSL v5.0, compared with NAL-NL2, higher amplification was calculated almost consistently for input levels of 65 and 80 dB SPL. Speech-recognition scores were best when the REAR reached +/- 5 dB or exceeded 5 dB the DSL v5.0 target and were lowest when the REAR fell more than 5 dB below the NAL-NL2 target.ConclusionsThe greatest impact of the REAR on speech recognition was observed at hearing losses between 50 and 80 dB HL. It was found that to optimise speech recognition and audibility for patients in this range HA fittings should target DSL v5.0 prescription values. For hearing losses below 50 dB HL, both NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0 may be considered for HA fitting. However, for hearing losses above 80 dB HL, aided speech recognition is insufficient in most cases.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Does Probe-Tube Verification of Real-Ear Hearing Aid Amplification Characteristics Improve Outcomes in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Almufarrij, Ibrahim
    Dillon, Harvey
    Munro, Kevin J.
    [J]. TRENDS IN HEARING, 2021, 25
  • [2] ANSI S3.5-1997 (R2017), 1997, Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index
  • [3] Bentler R., 2016, MODERN HEARING AIDS
  • [4] Comparative analysis of the NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0a prescription procedures in the adaptation of hearing aids in the elderly
    Bertozzo, Marilia Cancian
    Blasca, Wanderleia Quinhoneiro
    [J]. CODAS, 2019, 31 (04):
  • [5] A cross-over, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss
    Ching, Teresa Y. C.
    Scollie, Susan D.
    Dillon, Harvey
    Seewald, Richard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 49 : S4 - S15
  • [6] Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions
    Ching, Teresa Y. C.
    Scollie, Susan D.
    Dillon, Harvey
    Seewald, Richard
    Britton, Louise
    Steinberg, Jane
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 49 : S16 - S25
  • [7] Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners
    Digeser, Frank M.
    Engler, Max
    Hoppe, Ulrich
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 59 (05) : 383 - 391
  • [8] Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms
    Doerfler, C.
    Hocke, T.
    Hast, A.
    Hoppe, U.
    [J]. HNO, 2020, 68 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [9] Engler M, 2022, HNO, V70, P520, DOI 10.1007/s00106-021-01139-5
  • [10] Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients
    English, Ruth
    Plant, Kerrie
    Maciejczyk, Michael
    Cowan, Robert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2016, 55 : S45 - S50