Evaluating the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Compliance at Level 1 Trauma Centre, India: A Descriptive Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kausar, Mohammad [1 ]
Jamwal, Tilotma [1 ]
Gupta, Anant [1 ]
Gopathoti, Paavan [1 ]
Gupta, Babita [2 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Hosp Adm, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol Pain Med & Crit Care, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
WHO surgical safety checklist; Compliance; Perioperative safety; Intraoperative safety measures; Multidisciplinary surgical teams; Trauma centre; ADVERSE EVENTS; SURGERY; IMPLEMENTATION; MORTALITY; QUALITY; VOLUME; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s12262-025-04287-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Implementation of the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been associated with improved surgical outcomes by addressing critical processes during the perioperative period. Despite its proven benefits, compliance with the SSC remains a challenge in high-risk surgical settings. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the compliance with WHO SSC parameters across various surgical disciplines in a level 1 trauma centre of a tertiary care hospital and to provide recommendations for improving the compliance and overall effectiveness. A descriptive study was conducted from January 2021 to December 2023 at Apex Trauma Centre, Delhi, India. Data on SSC implementation was collected from 400 randomly selected surgical cases across the four surgical disciplines at trauma centre. Compliance was assessed for the three phases of the checklist, i.e. sign-in, time-out, and sign-out. Non-compliances to the SSC components were noted and data was analysed using SPSS software version 21.0. Compliance with the sign-in phase was high, with most items achieving compliance rates above 95%. The time-out phase showed varied compliance, with rates for team introductions and verbal confirmations ranging from 86 to 97%. The sign-out phase had the lowest compliance rates, particularly for instrument counts and specimen labelling, which were as low as 16%. Overall, the study highlighted high compliance with preoperative preparations but identified significant gaps in the intraoperative and postoperative checklist adherence. Continued education, integrating dedicated checklist coordinators, fostering teamwork, and implementing regular audits and feedback mechanisms are recommended to improve adherence and surgical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How does the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist fit with existing perioperative risk management strategies? An ethnographic study across surgical specialties
    Waehle, Hilde Valen
    Haugen, Arvid Steinar
    Wiig, Siri
    Softeland, Eirik
    Sevdalis, Nick
    Harthug, Stig
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [32] A preliminary study of patients' perceptions on the implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in women who had Cesarean sections
    Kawano, Takashi
    Tani, Megumi
    Taniwaki, Miki
    Ogata, Kimiyo
    Yokoyama, Masataka
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (03) : 459 - 462
  • [33] A prospective study of wound infection among post-discharge patients at a level 1 trauma centre of India
    Sharma, K.
    Thanbuana, B. T.
    Gupta, A. K.
    Rajkumari, N.
    Mathur, P.
    Gunjiyal, J.
    Misra, M. C.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02) : 198 - 201
  • [34] Traumatic brain injury in the elderly: A level 1 trauma centre study
    de Guise, Elaine
    LeBlanc, Joanne
    Dagher, Jehane
    Tinawi, Simon
    Lamoureux, Julie
    Marcoux, Judith
    Maleki, Mohammed
    Feyz, Mitra
    BRAIN INJURY, 2015, 29 (05) : 558 - 564
  • [35] The Gap between Individual Perception and Compliance: A Qualitative Follow-Up Study of the Surgical Safety Checklist Application
    Sendlhofer, Gerald
    Lumenta, David Benjamin
    Leitgeb, Karina
    Kober, Brigitte
    Jantscher, Lydia
    Schanbacher, Monika
    Berghold, Andrea
    Pregartner, Gudrun
    Brunner, Gernot
    Tax, Christa
    Kamolz, Lars Peter
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [36] Study protocol for a Prospective Observational study of Safety Threats and Adverse events in Trauma (PrO-STAT): a pilot study at a level-1 trauma centre in Canada
    Nazir, Anisa
    Mcgowan, Melissa
    Shore, Eliane M.
    Keown-Stoneman, Charles
    Grantcharov, Teodor
    Nolan, Brodie
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [37] Barriers and enablers to utilisation of the WHO surgical safety checklist at the university teaching hospital in Lusaka, Zambia: a qualitative study
    Judith Munthali
    Chiara Pittalis
    Leon Bijlmakers
    John Kachimba
    Mweene Cheelo
    Ruairi Brugha
    Jakub Gajewski
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [38] Customization and validation study of WHO surgical safety checklist as a tool to control medical error in operation rooms in Iran
    Mazloumi, Adel
    Marzi, Maryam Azizpour
    Garousi, Ehsan
    Yaseri, Mehdi
    Mehrdad, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, 2018, 8 (02) : 135 - +
  • [39] A clinical perspective study on the compliance of surgical safety checklist in all surgical procedures done in operation theatres, in a teaching hospital, Ethiopia, 2021: A clinical perspective study
    Mersh, Abraham Tarekegn
    Melesse, Debas Yaregal
    Chekol, Wubie Birlie
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 69
  • [40] Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines: a prospective descriptive study at a tertiary level hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
    Schuster, D.
    Fagan, J. J.
    Flint, M.
    Basera, W.
    Porrill, O.
    Piercy, J. L.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 26 (06) : 300 - 305