Feasibility of utilizing pectoral muscle thickness as a predictor for one repetition maximum bench press in trained men

被引:0
作者
Nigro, Federico [1 ]
de Lima, Dalton [1 ]
Jacaz, Davide [1 ]
Rosaci, Giuseppe [1 ]
Pegreffi, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Bartolomei, Sandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Life Qual Studies, Record Univ Sports Ctr,Via Del Pilastro 8, Bologna, 40137, Italy
[2] Univ Enna Kore, Dept Med & Surg, Enna, Italy
关键词
Equation; ultrasound; anthropometry; muscle architecture; strength; resistance training; BODY STRENGTH; FLAT-BACK; POWER; PERFORMANCE; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/02640414.2024.2430855
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to develop prediction equations for the one repetition maximum (1RM) Bench Press (BP) in resistance-trained men based on muscle thickness and simple anthropometric parameters. 83 men (age: 26.2 +/- 4.9y, height: 175.9 +/- 6.3 cm, body mass: 82.9 +/- 11.2 kg) participated in the present investigation and were assessed for anthropometric measurements and for muscle thickness of pectoral major (MTP). Then, the participants performed the 1RM BP test. A very large correlation was detected between MTP and 1RM BP (r = 0.83-0.88). A prediction equation based on MTP and body mass (EQ1) was developed: 1RM BP = -15.2460565 + (32.0751388 * MTP) + (0.6364405 * Body Weight) with R2 = 0.79. Another prediction equation was developed using MTP only (EQ2): 1RM BP = 20.36167 + (39.36532 * MTP) with R2 = 0.69. Bland-Altman analysis and paired sample t test provided insufficient evidence to support differences between the predicted and the measured 1RM BP in both the equations (p > 0.05). This study showed that both MTP based (EQ2) and MTP and body mass based (EQ1) methods can be used to predict 1RM BP and may represent important tools for the evaluation of maximal strength. These findings support the potential use of non-performance-based parameters to predict maximal dynamic strength in trained individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:2254 / 2259
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   NFL-225 TEST TO PREDICT 1RM BENCH PRESS IN NCAA DIVISION I FOOTBALL PLAYERS [J].
Mann, J. Bryan ;
Stoner, Josh D. ;
Mayhew, Jerry L. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2012, 26 (10) :2623-2631
[22]  
Mattiuzzi C., 2014, PERMANCE ENHANCEM, V3, P49, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2014.04.001, DOI 10.1016/J.PEH.2014.04.001]
[23]   A Comparison Between the Squat and the Deadlift for Lower Body Strength and Power Training [J].
Nigro, Federico ;
Bartolomei, Sandro .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN KINETICS, 2020, 73 (01) :145-152
[24]   A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors [J].
O'Brien, Robert M. .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2007, 41 (05) :673-690
[25]   Factors Underlying Bench Press Performance in Elite Competitive Powerlifters [J].
Reya, Matija ;
Skarabot, Jakob ;
Cveticanin, Branko ;
Sarabon, Nejc .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2021, 35 (08) :2179-2186
[26]   Anthropometric and Physical Qualities of Elite Male Youth Rugby League Players [J].
Till, Kevin ;
Scantlebury, Sean ;
Jones, Ben .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (11) :2171-2186
[27]   The Bench Press: A Comparison Between Flat-Back and Arched-Back Techniques [J].
Tungate, Phil .
STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2019, 41 (05) :86-89
[28]   EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT RELATIVE LOADS ON POWER PERFORMANCE DURING THE BALLISTIC PUSH-UP [J].
Wang, Ran ;
Hoffman, Jay R. ;
Sadres, Eliahu ;
Bartolomei, Sandro ;
Muddle, Tyler W. D. ;
Fukuda, David H. ;
Stout, Jeffrey R. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2017, 31 (12) :3411-3416
[29]   EVALUATING UPPER-BODY STRENGTH AND POWER FROM A SINGLE TEST: THE BALLISTIC PUSH-UP [J].
Wang, Ran ;
Hoffman, Jay R. ;
Sadres, Eliahu ;
Bartolomei, Sandro ;
Muddle, Tyler W. D. ;
Fukuda, David H. ;
Stout, Jeffrey R. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2017, 31 (05) :1338-1345
[30]   Validation of submaximal prediction equations for the 1 repetition maximum bench press test on a group of collegiate football players [J].
Whisenant, MJ ;
Panton, LB ;
East, WB ;
Broeder, CE .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2003, 17 (02) :221-227