The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence

被引：2
|
作者：
Aczel, Balazs [1 ]
Barwich, Ann - Sophie [2 ,3 ]
Diekman, Amanda B. [4 ]
Fishbach, Ayelet [5 ]
Goldstone, Robert L. [3 ,4 ]
Gomez, Pablo [6 ]
Gundersen, Odd Erik [7 ,8 ]
Hippel, Paul T. von [9 ]
Holcombe, Alex O. [10 ]
Lewandowsky, Stephan [11 ,12 ]
Nozari, Nazbanou [4 ]
Pestilli, Franco [13 ,14 ]
Ioannidis, John P. A. [15 ,16 ,17 ,18 ]
机构：
[1] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Inst Psychol, Dept Affect Psychol, H-1063 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Hist & Philosophy Sci & Med, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Cognit Sci Program, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Booth Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Skidmore Coll, Psychol Dept, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 USA
[7] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp Sci, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[8] Aneo AI Res, NO-7031 Trondheim, Norway
[9] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[10] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[11] Univ Bristol, Sch Psychol Sci, Bristol BS81TU, England
[12] Univ Potsdam, Dept Psychol, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[13] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Liberal Arts, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[14] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Nat Sci, Dept Neurosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[15] Stanford Univ, Meta Res Innovat Ctr Stanford, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[16] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[17] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[18] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源：
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | 2025年 / 122卷 / 05期
关键词：
peer review crisis; publication system; scientific community; ECONOMICS; GENDER; MANUSCRIPT; ARTICLES; SLOWDOWN; JOURNALS; BIAS;
D O I：
10.1073/pnas.2401232121
中图分类号：
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
What is wrong with the peer review system? Is peer review sustainable? Useful? What other models exist? These are central yet contentious questions in today's academic discourse. This perspective critically discusses alternative models and revisions to the peer review system. The authors highlight possible changes to the peer review system, with the goal of fostering further dialog among the main stakeholders, including producers and consumers of scientific research. Neither our list of identified issues with the peer review system nor our discussed resolutions are complete. A point of agreement is that fair assessment and efficient change would require more comprehensive and rigorous data on the various aspects of the peer review system.
引用
收藏
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
12345