Primary data share indicator for social life cycle assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Roche, Lindsey [1 ]
Holzapfel, Peter [1 ]
Finkbeiner, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Chair Sustainable Engn, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA); Primary data share (PDS); Site-specific; Company-specific; Data specificity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145051
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) is a methodology to assess social impacts of products and organizations from a life cycle perspective, but data specificity and quality vary, and transparency regarding these aspects is often lacking. The product carbon footprint (PCF) industry initiatives have recently developed the primary data share (PDS) indicator to assess supply chain specificity and encourage primary data usage to better reflect specific emissions. This concept extends to social impacts, where site-specific data better reflects actual social impacts than generic data, which only indicates social risk. To transfer this concept to S-LCA, primary and site-specific data definitions were reviewed from various sustainability guidelines and three indicators were proposed: primary data share (PDSS-LCA), site-specific data share (SDSS-LCA), and company-specific data share (CDSS-LCA). These indicators were then applied to a case study on the foreground system of lithium production in Chile. Differences in the data specificity indicators were seen between the considered stakeholder groups. The Local community surrounding the lithium mining production site had the highest PDS (48%) due to a strong focus on interview-based primary data collection for this stakeholder. The CDS was above 90% for all stakeholder groups due to high data availability for secondary, company-specific data. Overall, the PDSS-LCA was 32%, 50% for SDSS- LCA, and reached 95% for CDSS-LCA. The proposed data specificity indicators were found to be applicable within the case study and increased transparency on data specificity, thereby encouraging increased use of primary and site- or company-specific data to more accurately reflect actual social impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methodologies for social life cycle assessment
    Andreas Jørgensen
    Agathe Le Bocq
    Liudmila Nazarkina
    Michael Hauschild
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2008, 13 : 96 - 103
  • [2] Methodologies for social life cycle assessment
    Jorgensen, Andreas
    Le Bocq, Agathe
    Nazarkina, Liudmila
    Hauschild, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (02) : 96 - 103
  • [3] Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA)
    Annekatrin Lehmann
    Eva Zschieschang
    Marzia Traverso
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Liselotte Schebek
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1581 - 1592
  • [4] Adapting ergonomic assessments to Social Life Cycle Assessment
    Chang, Ya-Ju
    The Duy Nguyen
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Krueger, Joerg
    13TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - DECOUPLING GROWTH FROM RESOURCE USE, 2016, 40 : 91 - 96
  • [5] Environmental and Social Life Cycle Assessment of welding technologies
    Chang, Ya-Ju
    Sproesser, Gunther
    Neugebauer, Sabrina
    Wolf, Kirana
    Scheumann, Rene
    Pittner, Andreas
    Rethmeier, Michael
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    12TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - EMERGING POTENTIALS, 2015, 26 : 293 - 298
  • [6] Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies-challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA)
    Lehmann, Annekatrin
    Zschieschang, Eva
    Traverso, Marzia
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Schebek, Liselotte
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (08) : 1581 - 1592
  • [7] The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time!
    Benoit, Catherine
    Norris, Gregory A.
    Valdivia, Sonia
    Ciroth, Andreas
    Moberg, Asa
    Bos, Ulrike
    Prakash, Siddharth
    Ugaya, Cassia
    Beck, Tabea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (02) : 156 - 163
  • [8] The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time!
    Catherine Benoît
    Gregory A. Norris
    Sonia Valdivia
    Andreas Ciroth
    Asa Moberg
    Ulrike Bos
    Siddharth Prakash
    Cassia Ugaya
    Tabea Beck
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010, 15 : 156 - 163
  • [9] Social Life-Cycle Assessment: A Review by Bibliometric Analysis
    Huertas-Valdivia, Irene
    Ferrari, Anna Maria
    Settembre-Blundo, Davide
    Garcia-Muina, Fernando E.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (15)
  • [10] Rigor in social life cycle assessment: improving the scientific grounding of SLCA
    Emily Grubert
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 481 - 491