A comprehensive review on applications of multi-criteria decision-making methods in healthcare waste management

被引:0
作者
Chakraborty, Santonab [1 ]
Raut, Rakesh D. [1 ]
Rofin, T. M. [1 ]
Chakraborty, Shankar [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management, Dept Operat & Supply Chain Management, Mumbai, MH, India
[2] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, 188 SC Mullick Rd, Kolkata 700032, WB, India
关键词
Healthcare waste; literature review; MCDM; alternative; criteria; sustainable; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; MEDICAL WASTE; TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES; SELECTION; LOCATION; CRITERIA; ALTERNATIVES; HOSPITALS; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X251320872
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Effective management of healthcare waste (HCW) imposes a great challenge to all countries. Specially in the developing countries, it is often mixed with municipal waste, adversely affecting the health and safety of the medical personnel, general public and environment. Healthcare waste management (HCWM) basically deals with segregation, collection and storage, routing and transportation, treatment and safe disposal of HCW, while obeying some national legislation. In every stage of HCWM, there are several alternative choices/strategies to be evaluated against a set of conflicting criteria. Numerous multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have appeared to resolve the issue. This article reviews 101 articles available in Scopus and other scholarly databases on applications of MCDM techniques in solving HCWM problems. Those articles are classified into six groups: (a) selection of the most effective HCW treatment technology, (b) identification of the best HCW disposal site, (c) assessment of the best-performing healthcare unit adopting ideal HCWM strategies, (d) selection of third party logistics providers, (e) identification of HCWM barriers and (f) evaluation of specific HCWM plans. It is observed that the past researchers have mostly preferred to apply MCDM tools for solving HCW treatment technology selection problems, whereas analytic hierarchy process, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory and best-worst method and fuzzy set theory have been the mostly favoured MCDM tool, criteria weight measurement techniques and uncertainty model, respectively. The outcomes of this article would help the healthcare personnel/policymakers in unveiling the current status of HCWM research, exploring extant research gaps and challenges and providing future directions leading to sustainable environment.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 144 条
[51]   A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method and its application to healthcare waste treatment technology selection [J].
Goldani, Nastaran ;
Ishizaka, Alessio .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024,
[52]   Evaluating and selecting sustainable logistics service providers for medical waste disposal treatment in the healthcare industry [J].
Gorcun, Omer Faruk ;
Aytekin, Ahmet ;
Korucuk, Selcuk ;
Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 408
[53]   Siting of a central healthcare waste incinerator using GIS-based Multi Criteria Decision Analysis [J].
Hariz, Husna Ali ;
Donmez, Cem Cagri ;
Sennaroglu, Bahar .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 :1031-1042
[54]   Assessment of Healthcare Waste Management Paradigms and Its Suitable Treatment Alternative: A Case Study [J].
Hasan, Mohammad Mehedi ;
Rahman, M. Habibur .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 2018
[55]  
Hemeda A., 2019, OPER RES ENG SCI, V2, P92, DOI [10.31181/oresta1903092b, DOI 10.31181/ORESTA1903092B]
[56]   Assessment of Healthcare Waste Treatment Alternatives Using an Integrated Decision Support Framework [J].
Hinduja, Akshay ;
Pandey, Manju .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2019, 12 (01) :318-333
[57]   Optimal evaluation of infectious medical waste disposal companies using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [J].
Ho, Chao Chung .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (07) :1553-1559
[58]   Selection of infectious medical waste disposal firms by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis [J].
Hsu, Pi-Fang ;
Wu, Cheng-Ru ;
Li, Ya-Ting .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (08) :1386-1394
[59]  
Hwang C. L., 1981, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
[60]  
Ishtiaq P, 2018, WASTE MANAGE RES, V36, P386, DOI [10.1177/0734242X18755894, 10.1177/0734242x18755894]