Punitive Disentitlement Within Private Law?

被引:0
作者
Liau, Timothy [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
关键词
punishment; private law; disentitlement; remedies; culpability; DAMAGES; PUNISHMENT; TORT;
D O I
10.1093/ojls/gqaf004
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Does private law punish? Should it? I question whether private law punishes in a form other than through a court order of punitive damages, by exploring a less obvious form of punishment to which less attention has been paid-'punitive disentitlement'-wherein a person is disentitled from a legal right, defence, or other legal advantage they would and should otherwise be entitled to, because of their misconduct. Potential instances are identified and analysed in a broad survey of private law doctrine, including the laws of property, contract, unjust enrichment and torts. The strongest reason for punitive disentitlement is its immunity to a powerful normative objection to punitive damages. Punitive disentitlement is not free from difficulties, however. It inherits some of the difficulties associated with punitive damages; it also runs into a separate set of objections. We should therefore be more alert to, and cautious about, its continued use.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 225 条
[1]  
Ames James Barr, 1897, American Law Register and Review, V45, P225
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Civil Evidence Act
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Alliance And Leicester Building Society v Edgestop Ltd
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Lane v Holloway
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Representation of the People Act van
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, EWCA Civ817
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Stupples v Stupples & Co (High Wycombe) Ltd
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Scottish Equitable Plc v Derby
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1938, Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Abou-Rahmah v Abacha