Exploring Simulated Practice in Teacher Education: Opportunities to Professionalize the Teacher Role

被引:0
作者
Aagaard, Toril [1 ]
Bueie, Agnete [1 ]
Froytlog, Jo Inge Johansen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Eastern Norway, Fac Humanities Sports & Educ Sci, N-3679 Notodden, Norway
来源
EDUCATION SCIENCES | 2025年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
digital; simulation; teacher education; agency; professional development;
D O I
10.3390/educsci15020182
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In Norway, as in many other countries worldwide, student teachers often report a lack of coherence between their practice experiences and the teacher training provided on campus. For example, student teachers request more practice-relevant campus training on themes like parent-teacher conferences. Employers worldwide expect universities to prepare graduates to innovate practices. This empirical article addresses these challenges by engaging student teachers in simulation-based practice designs (SPDs), which include a class brief, group sessions with simulated parent-teacher conferences, and a debrief. The students are encouraged to act with agency and approach the simulated situations critically. Overall, this study shows that students are highly engaged and task-oriented across SPDs. The survey data (n = 39) show that students perceive the simulation experiences as relevant preparation for their future practice. Audio recordings (215 min) and field notes indicate that they are triggered to critically reflect on and generate ideas for addressing challenges in the simulated situations. There are instances of linking theory with practice, and even some "thinking outside the box". SPDs provide valuable opportunities to professionalize the teacher role but could benefit from more support and time to bridge the gap between theory and practice and encourage more innovative thinking.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Amundsen F.M., Praksis i lærerutdanningene: Hva kjennetegner vellykket og mislykket praksis? [School practice in teacher education: What characterizes successful and less successful school practice?], (2021)
  • [2] Brown A.L., Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 2, pp. 141-178, (1992)
  • [3] Chernikova O., Heitzmann N., Stadler M., Holzberger D., Seidel T., Fischer F., Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 90, 4, pp. 499-541, (2020)
  • [4] deNoyelles A., Raider-Roth M., Being an ‘agent provocateur’: Utilising online spaces for teacher professional development in virtual simulation games, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25, 3, pp. 337-353, (2015)
  • [5] Dittrich L., Aagaard T., Hjukse H., The perceived affordances of simulation-based learning: Online student teachers’ perspectives, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 1, (2022)
  • [6] Engeness I., Developing teachers’ digital identity: Towards the pedagogic design principles of digital environments to enhance students’ learning in the 21st century, European Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 1, pp. 96-114, (2021)
  • [7] Facione P.A., Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts, Insight Assessment, 1, 1, pp. 1-23, (2011)
  • [8] Faldet A.C., Skrefsrud T.A., Somby H.M., Exploring the pedagogical potential of virtual reality simulations for pre-service teachers from a Vygotskyan perspective, Digital Culture and Education, 13, 1, pp. 67-80, (2021)
  • [9] Flavian H., Levin O., Using simulation-based learning to inform preservice teachers’ professional development, Teaching Education, 35, 2, pp. 145-161, (2023)
  • [10] Hellesnes G., Elevsamtalens mellomkroppslige, relasjonelle og eksistensielle dimensjon: En lærers opplevelse av planlagte elevsamtaler i grunnskolen i dialog med kroppslige, relasjonelle og eksistensielle teoretiske perspektiver, Dance Articulated, 5, 3, (2019)