The cause of perioperative hypersensitivity in adults and consequences of subsequent anesthesia

被引:0
|
作者
Katran, Zeynep Yegin [1 ]
Bulut, Ismet [1 ]
Saydin, Firat [2 ]
Yavuz, Dilek [3 ]
Cosar, Nazli Deniz [2 ]
Katran, Mustafa [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Sureyyapasa Training & Res Hosp, Dept Allergy & Immunol, TR-34844 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Univ Hlth Sci, Sureyyapasa Training & Res Hosp, Dept Chest Dis, 34844 Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Univ Hlth Sci, Yedikule Training & Res Hosp, Dept Allergy & Immunol, Telsiz 93 Sk 12, TR-34020 Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Marmara Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Basibuyuk Mah Maltepe,Basibuyuk Yolu Sok 9-1, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
drug allergy; general anesthesia; neuromuscular blocking agents; latex; perioperative hypersensitivity reactions; IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY; ANAPHYLAXIS; SURGERY; ALLERGY;
D O I
10.15586/aei.v53i2.1281
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: In the perioperative period, patients are exposed to many agents that may cause hypersensitivity reaction; so, finding the culprit drug is important for patient safety in the event of the need for repeat anesthesia. Aim: Our aim was to share demographic data, clinical features, and diagnostic tests of patients who developed perioperative hypersensitivity (POH) and in whom the culprit drug was identified. Methods: Patients evaluated for POH between 2016 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Results of anesthesia notes, agents used in anesthesia, skin prick test, and intradermal test (IDT) to determine the culprit drug were examined. Patients were interviewed by telephone and questioned about their reanesthesia status. Results: The files of 167,688 patients were analyzed; 405 patients were referred and tested for POH and 330 patients were excluded from the study because they had no history of POH or the culprit drug could not be identified. The study was completed with 75 patients. POH developed during the induction of anesthesia (I) in 18, maintenance (M) in 34, and at the end (E) in 23 patients. The median age was 48, out of which 89.3% (n = 67) were females. Reactions developed during genitourinary system surgery in 33.3% (n = 25), ear-nose-throat surgery in 17.3% (n = 13), and abdominal surgery in 17.3% (n = 13); anaphylaxis developed in 56% (n = 42) (I: 9; M: 21; E: 12); cutaneous involvement in 73.3% (n = 55); cardiovascular involvement in 41.3% (n = 31), respiratory system involvement in 56% (n = 42), and gastrointestinal involvement in 4% (n = 3); Brown grade 1 in 44% (n = 33) and grade 3 in 38.7% (n = 29); Ring and Messmer classification, grade 1 in 44% (n = 33); and cardiac arrest in five patients. For the distribution of culprit drugs: neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in 22.7%, opioids in 21.4%, hypnotics in 17.3%, and antibiotics in 14.6%. In four patients, multiple agents were determined. Skin prick test was positive in 35.1% and IDT positivity was found in 98.6%. Surgery was cancelled in 40% (n = 30), but it was determined that 50 patients (66.7%) underwent surgery after drug tests. All of them tolerated surgery. Conclus & imath;on: A large number of patients were evaluated because we are a reference hospital. The most common culprit drug group in POH is NMBA; reanesthesia situations are safe after allergist evaluation. (c) 2025 Codon Publications. Published by Codon Publications.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 123
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A CLUSTER OF ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS IN CHILDREN WITH SPINA-BIFIDA DURING GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - EPIDEMIOLOGIC FEATURES, RISK-FACTORS, AND LATEX HYPERSENSITIVITY
    KELLY, KJ
    PEARSON, ML
    KURUP, VP
    HAVENS, PL
    BYRD, RS
    SETLOCK, MA
    BUTLER, JC
    SLATER, JE
    GRAMMER, LC
    RESNICK, A
    ROBERTS, M
    JARVIS, WR
    DAVIS, JP
    FINK, JN
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 94 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [32] Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling
    Dave, Bhumy A.
    Jaber, Camaleigh
    Leader-Cramer, Alix
    Higgins, Nicole
    Mueller, Margaret
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Kenton, Kimberly
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (09) : 1327 - 1332
  • [33] Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions: Time for Collaboration
    Garvey, Lene H.
    Ebo, Didier G.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (05) : 1992 - 1993
  • [34] Anesthesia-induced electroencephalogram oscillations and perioperative outcomes in older adults undergoing cardiac surgery
    Freedman, Isaac G.
    Boncompte, Gonzalo
    Qu, Jason Z.
    Khawaja, Zain Q.
    Turco, Isabella
    Mueller, Ariel
    Wiredu, Kwame
    Mckay, Tina B.
    Westover, M. Brandon
    Pedemonte, Juan C.
    Akeju, Oluwaseun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2025, 102
  • [35] Sex and gender differences in anesthesia: Relevant also for perioperative safety?
    Filipescu, Daniela
    Stefan, Mihai
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (01) : 141 - 153
  • [36] Effects of Anesthesia Protocol on Perioperative Outcomes and Costs of Lumbar Microdiscectomies
    Tarikci Kilic, Ebru
    Naderi, Sait
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 29 (06) : 843 - 850
  • [37] Narcolepsy, Anesthesia, and Sedation: A Survey of the Perioperative Experience of Patients With Narcolepsy
    Hershner, Shelley
    Kakkar, Rahul
    Chung, Frances
    Singh, Mandeep
    Wong, Jean
    Auckley, Dennis
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 129 (05) : 1374 - 1380
  • [38] Perioperative Pain Management in Bariatric Anesthesia
    Eipe, Naveen
    Budiansky, Adele
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 16 (03) : 339 - 346
  • [39] Impact of Regional Anesthesia on Perioperative Outcomes
    Opperer M.
    Stundner O.
    Memtsoudis S.G.
    Current Anesthesiology Reports, 2015, 5 (2) : 209 - 216
  • [40] Quality indicators for anesthesia and perioperative medicine
    Wacker, Johannes
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 36 (02) : 208 - 215