Networks of Beliefs: An Integrative Theory of Individual- and Social-Level Belief Dynamics

被引:3
作者
Dalege, Jonas [1 ,2 ]
Galesic, Mirta [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Olsson, Henrik [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, NL-1018 WT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Complex Sci Hub, Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Vermont, Vermont Complex Syst Ctr, Burlington, VT USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
beliefs; networks; attention; dissonance; STATISTICAL PHYSICS; CONNECTIONIST MODEL; LOCAL CONVERGENCE; ATTITUDE; DISSONANCE; AMBIVALENCE; OPINION; POLARIZATION; PERCEPTION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1037/rev0000494
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We present a theory of belief dynamics that explains the interplay between internal beliefs in people's minds and beliefs of others in their external social environments. The networks of belief theory goes beyond existing theories of belief dynamics in three ways. First, it provides an explicit connection between belief networks in individual minds and belief dynamics on social networks. The connection, absent from most previous theories, is established through people's social beliefs or perceived beliefs of others. Second, the theory recognizes that the correspondence between social beliefs and others' actual beliefs can be imperfect, because social beliefs are affected by personal beliefs as well as by the actual beliefs of others. Past theories of belief dynamics on social networks do not distinguish between perceived and actual beliefs of others. Third, the theory explains diverse belief dynamics phenomena parsimoniously through the differences in attention and the resulting felt dissonances in personal, social, and external parts of belief networks. We implement our theoretical assumptions in a computational model within a statistical physics framework and derive model predictions. We find support for our theoretical assumptions and model predictions in two large survey studies (N1 = 973, N2 = 669). We then derive insights about diverse phenomena related to belief dynamics, including group consensus and polarization, group radicalization, minority influence, and different empirically observed belief distributions. We discuss how the theory goes beyond different existing models of belief dynamics and outline promising directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 290
页数:38
相关论文
共 140 条
[81]   Uniformity, Bipolarization and Pluriformity Captured as Generic Stylized Behavior with an Agent-Based Simulation Model of Attitude Change [J].
Wander Jager ;
Frédéric Amblard .
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 2005, 10 (4) :295-303
[82]   Is there any "free" choice? Self and dissonance in two cultures [J].
Kitayama, S ;
Snibbe, AC ;
Markus, HR ;
Suzuki, T .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (08) :527-533
[83]   THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF MAJORITIES AND MINORITIES [J].
LATANE, B ;
WOLF, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1981, 88 (05) :438-453
[84]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SOCIAL IMPACT [J].
LATANE, B .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1981, 36 (04) :343-356
[85]   The nonlinear feedback dynamics of asymmetric political polarization [J].
Leonard, Naomi Ehrich ;
Lipsitz, Keena ;
Bizyaeva, Anastasia ;
Franci, Alessio ;
Lelkes, Yphtach .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (50)
[86]   The dynamics of political polarization [J].
Levin, Simon A. ;
Milner, Helen, V ;
Perrings, Charles .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (50)
[87]  
Martin R., 2009, Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes and consequences, DOI [10.4324/9780203865552, DOI 10.4324/9780203865552]
[88]   A CROSS-CUTTING CALM HOW SOCIAL SORTING DRIVES AFFECTIVE POLARIZATION [J].
Mason, Lilliana .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2016, 80 :351-377
[89]   Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans' support for partisan violence [J].
Mernyk, Joseph S. ;
Pink, Sophia L. ;
Druckman, James N. ;
Willer, Robb .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (16)
[90]   A general connectionist model of attitude structure and change: The ACS (attitudes as constraint satisfaction) model [J].
Monroe, Brian M. ;
Read, Stephen J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (03) :733-759