Chinese consumers' dish value: a best-worst scaling approach

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Erpeng [1 ]
Nian, Yefan [2 ]
Gao, Zhifeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] CLEMSON UNIV, SANDHILL RES & EDUC CTR, Dept Agr Sci, Sunset, SC USA
[3] Univ Florida, Food & Resource Econ, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | 2025年 / 127卷 / 03期
关键词
Dish values; Dish consumption behaviour; Best-worst scaling; Cluster analysis; FOOD; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1108/BFJ-07-2024-0664
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
PurposeThis paper aims to identify Chinese consumers' dish value systems and investigate whether and to what extent their dish values vary by type of consumers.Design/methodology/approachWe used a best-worst scaling (BWS) developed based on previous literature on food values and attributes of Chinese dishes to elicit Chinese consumers' dish value structure. Then, we estimated each participant's share of preferences for dish values and applied Ward's linkage cluster analysis to identify the heterogeneity of their dish values.FindingsOur results indicate that food safety values, including the safety of agricultural products, additives and food processing, are valued most by Chinese consumers. They rate health-nutrition values as the second most important dish values. There is significant heterogeneity in Chinese consumers' dish values. Their dish values tend to drive their dish consumption patterns.Originality/valueThe dish is the mainstay of the Chinese meal. This study is among a few studies that examine Chinese consumers' dish values that underlie consumer dish preferences and choices. The results provide essential information to promote a healthy and sustainable diet among Chinese consumers by understanding their values and motivations for making dish choices.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1167
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Comparison of best-worst and hedonic scaling for the measurement of consumer wine preferences
    Mueller, S.
    Francis, I. L.
    Lockshin, L.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (03) : 205 - 215
  • [43] An examination of help-seeking preferences via best-worst scaling
    Lannin, Daniel G.
    Barrowclough, Michael
    Vogel, David L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 76 (09) : 1677 - 1695
  • [44] Analyzing Strawberry Preferences: Best-Worst Scaling Methodology and Purchase Styles
    Sparacino, Antonina
    Ollani, Selene
    Baima, Lorenzo
    Oliviero, Michael
    Borra, Danielle
    Rui, Mingze
    Mastromonaco, Giulia
    FOODS, 2024, 13 (10)
  • [45] USING BEST-WORST SCALING IN HORIZON SCANNING FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA TECHNOLOGIES
    Gallego, Gisselle
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Flynn, Terry
    Blauvelt, Barri M.
    Niessen, Louis W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 28 (03) : 339 - 346
  • [46] Feasibility of a best-worst scaling exercise to set priorities for autism research
    Davis, Scott A.
    Howard, Kirsten
    Ellis, Alan R.
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    Carey, Timothy S.
    Morrissey, Joseph P.
    Thomas, Kathleen C.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (04) : 1643 - 1651
  • [47] An introduction to the application of (case 1) best-worst scaling in marketing research
    Louviere, Jordan
    Lings, Ian
    Islam, Towhidul
    Gudergan, Siegfried
    Flynn, Terry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2013, 30 (03) : 292 - 303
  • [48] Consumers' preferences for processed meat: a best–worst scaling approach in three European countries
    Áron Török
    Ching-Hua Yeh
    Davide Menozzi
    Péter Balogh
    Péter Czine
    Agricultural and Food Economics, 11
  • [49] Investigating heterogeneity in food risk perceptions using best-worst scaling
    Millman, Caroline
    Rigby, Dan
    Jones, Davey L.
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2021, 24 (10) : 1288 - 1303
  • [50] Public preferences for street tree characteristics: A best-worst scaling experiment
    Doll, Claire
    Rollins, Curtis
    Rehdanz, Katrin
    Meyerhoff, Juergen
    Burton, Michael
    Pannell, David
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2025, 104