Improving colonoscopy quality in the national VA healthcare system

被引:0
作者
Gawron, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ]
Bailey, Travis [1 ]
Codden, Rachel [2 ]
Dominitz, Jason [3 ]
Gupta, Samir [4 ,5 ]
Helfrich, Christian [3 ]
Kahi, Charles [6 ,7 ]
Krop, Lila [8 ,9 ]
Malvar, Carmel [8 ,9 ]
Mckee, Grace [9 ,10 ]
Millar, Morgan [2 ]
Mog, Ashley [3 ]
Nguyen-Vu, Tiffany [8 ,9 ]
Patterson, Olga [2 ]
Presson, Angela P. [2 ]
Saini, Sameer [11 ,12 ]
Whooley, Mary [8 ,10 ]
Yao, Yiwen [1 ,2 ]
Zickmund, Susan [2 ]
Kaltenbach, Tonya [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] VA Salt Lake City Hlth Care Syst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[4] VA San Diego, San Diego, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Biol, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Richard L Roudebush Vet Adm Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[8] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[10] San Francisco VA Hlth Care Syst, Measurement Sci Qual Enhancement Res Initiat, San Francisco, CA USA
[11] VA HSR&D Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[12] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Quality improvement; Adenoma detection rate; Implementation; Quality reporting; Veterans affairs; VIRTUAL BREAKTHROUGH SERIES; INTERRUPTED TIME-SERIES; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVES; LEARNING COLLABORATIVES; REGRESSION; IMPLEMENTATION; PREVENTION; COMPONENTS; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2024.107784
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is a Veterans Affairs (VA) priority. Colonoscopy quality, especially adenoma detection rate (ADR), is critical for effective screening. Our research indicates considerable variation in ADR among VA providers. Even a slight increase in ADR can reduce fatal CRC rates, and audit and feedback strategies have improved ADR in other settings. A recent report identified deficiencies in VA colonoscopy quality, highlighting the need for standardized documentation and reporting. To address this, we developed the VA Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program (VA-EQuIP), which aims to improve colonoscopy quality through benchmarking and collaborative learning, aligning with VA's modernization priorities and HSR&D and QUERI goals of accelerating evidence-based implementation. Methods: We will conduct a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate whether VA-EQuIP improves provider ADR compared to usual care, the implementation of VA-EQuIP, site-level factors associated with colonoscopy quality improvement, and components of provider behavior change. Using mixed methods our study will measure outcomes like reach, implementation, adoption, maintenance of VA-EQuIP, and provider behavior change. The analysis will include primary and secondary outcomes, such as overall and screening ADR, cecal intubation rate, and bowel preparation quality, using mixed effects generalized linear models and interrupted time-series analyses. Adoption and implementation will be evaluated through usage statistics, surveys, and qualitative interviews to identify factors influencing success. Discussion: This study will assess the impact of VA-EQuIP on colonoscopy quality metrics and factors associated with effective implementation. VA-EQuIP infrastructure allows for national-scale implementation and evaluation of quality reporting with minimal manual labor, guiding future quality improvement efforts to ensure optimal patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Alleged Access Delays and Surgery Service Concerns VA Roseburg Healthcare System, Office of Healthcare Inspections
  • [2] [Anonymous], Interrupted time-series analysis yielded an effect estimate concordant with the cluster-randomized controlled trial result - ScienceDirect
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, R Foundation for Statistical Computing
  • [4] A RANDOM-EFFECTS REGRESSION-MODEL FOR METAANALYSIS
    BERKEY, CS
    HOAGLIN, DC
    MOSTELLER, F
    COLDITZ, GA
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (04) : 395 - 411
  • [5] Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
    Brenner, Hermann
    Stock, Christian
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [6] Can Learning Collaboratives Support Implementation by Rewiring Professional Networks?
    Bunger, Alicia C.
    Hanson, Rochelle F.
    Doogan, Nathan J.
    Powell, Byron J.
    Cao, Yiwen
    Dunn, Jerry
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 43 (01) : 79 - 92
  • [7] Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research
    Campbell, MK
    Fayers, PM
    Grimshaw, JM
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 2 (02) : 99 - 107
  • [8] Corley DA, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P1298, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
  • [9] Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?
    Coyne, IT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1997, 26 (03) : 623 - 630
  • [10] Dillman D.A., 2014, INTERNET PHONE MAIL