ChatGPT Usage Scale in Education: Validity and Reliability Study

被引:0
|
作者
Taktak, Mustafa [1 ]
Bafrali, Gorsev [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Gelisim Univ, Avcilar, Turkiye
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION | 2025年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
ChatGPT; Education; Scale development; Reliability; Validity;
D O I
10.46328/ijte.1024
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale to measure individuals' and organizations' attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT, emphasizing the necessity for organizations to adapt to rapidly evolving information and technology environments. The methodology consisted of three stages. In the first stage, a 13 item draft scale was administered to 213 participants, and its construct validity was evaluated through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). In the second stage, based on EFA results, the scale was reduced to 12 items and administered to 175 participants, followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to validate its structure. In the third stage, test-retest reliability and criterion validity were examined with 67 school administrators and teachers. The analyses revealed that the scale consisted of two dimensions, "opportunities" and "challenges," and CFA confirmed this structure, with fit indices falling within acceptable ranges. The overall reliability coefficient (Cronbach's Alpha) was calculated as 0.71, and further analyses, including independent sample t-tests, item-total and item-residual correlations, inter-factor correlations, and test-retest correlations, supported the scale's validity and reliability. Based on the findings, the scale was recommended to be named the "ChatGPT Usage Scale," offering a valuable tool for assessing attitudes toward ChatGPT use among individuals and organizations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LIFELONG LEARNING COMPETENCE SCALE (LLLCS): THE STUDY OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY
    Uzunboylu, Huseyin
    Hursen, Cigdem
    HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2011, (41): : 449 - 460
  • [22] Vulnerable Baby Scale: A validity and reliability study
    Celik, Melike Yavas
    Cigdem, Zerrin
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2020, 11 (03): : 188 - 194
  • [23] Reflective Thinking Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
    Basol, Gulsah
    Gencel, Ilke Evin
    KURAM VE UYGULAMADA EGITIM BILIMLERI, 2013, 13 (02): : 941 - 946
  • [24] Validity and Reliability Study of Safety Climate Scale
    Dursun, Salih
    Basol, Oguz
    Sengul, Belemir
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMY CULTURE AND SOCIETY, 2022, (65): : 203 - 216
  • [25] The scale for contraversive pushing: A reliability and validity study
    Baccini, Marco
    Paci, Matteo
    Rinaldi, Lucio A.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2006, 20 (04) : 468 - 472
  • [26] Validity and Reliability of Tablet Supported Education Attitude and Usability Scale
    Uzunboylu, Huseyin
    Tugun, Vasfi
    JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 22 (01) : 82 - 93
  • [27] The Teacher Efficacy Scale: A Reliability and Validity Study
    Nie, Youyan
    Lau, Shun
    Liau, Albert K.
    ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 2012, 21 (02) : 414 - 420
  • [28] Validity and reliability study of charity hazard scale
    Ozkan, Abdul Halim
    Ciftcioglu, Gokcen Alev
    Guzel, Burcin Hulya
    Basol, Oguz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 99
  • [29] The validity and the reliability study of the Egocentricism Scale in Turkish
    Askun, Duysal
    Cetin, Fatih
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 18 (05): : 485 - 494
  • [30] A Validity and Reliability Study of the Engineering and Engineering Education Attitude Scale (EEAS)
    Korkmaz, Ozgen
    Kosterelioglu, Meltem
    Kara, Mehmet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY, 2018, 8 (05): : 44 - 57