The social licence of salmon aquaculture in Tasmania: Fulfilling the social bargain

被引:0
|
作者
Buckwell, Andrew [1 ,3 ]
Hasan, Syezlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Knight, Alana [1 ,3 ]
Fleming, Christopher [1 ]
Harte, Jeremy [2 ,3 ]
Smart, James C. R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Griffith Business Sch, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Blue Econ Cooperat Res Ctr, Launceston, Tas, Australia
关键词
Aquaculture; Blue economy; Q; -methodology; Social licence to operate; OPERATE; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; AUSTRALIA; DEFINITIONS; COMMUNITY; CONTRACT; INDUSTRY; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106653
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Salmon aquaculture is one of a number of industries in Tasmania that can benefit from new technologies to reduce the local ecological and community amenity impacts of its coastal operations. This may assist the industry in retaining its social licence to operate (SLO), which is currently in question, so that it can continue generating benefits for local livelihoods. We used Q-methodology to gain empirical insight into aquaculture stakeholder perspectives on the role that SLO plays in maintaining the industry's legitimacy. Results revealed four factors, all of which saw genuine engagement with strategies to retain SLO as being fundamental to the industry's future. Whilst three factors prioritised the economic and employment benefits of the industry as playing an important role in this-as part of a social bargain with the community-all four factors believed that the continued legitimacy of the industry requires broader civil society consent. One factor considered the industry as being under pressure, but nevertheless felt a SLO could be re-established if the industry followed certain steps to secure it. Our research demonstrates that salmon aquaculture would do well to continue to actively seek SLO, achievement of which will maximise total net social benefit and point to pathways that begin to incorporate the nature-positive and people-positive agendas. It should also consider engagement with both communities of place and communities of practice as it explores opportunities in the blue economy and recognise that disclosure and transparency will assist in demonstrating procedural fairness.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A social license to operate for aquaculture: Reflections from Tasmania
    Alexander, Karen A.
    AQUACULTURE, 2022, 550
  • [2] Social licence and aquaculture: Towards a research agenda
    Mather, Charles
    Fanning, Lucia
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 99 : 275 - 282
  • [3] A social license to operate for aquaculture in Tasmania: The importance of theory-testing
    Alexander, Karen A.
    AQUACULTURE, 2025, 595
  • [4] The role of relationships in achieving and maintaining a social licence in the New Zealand aquaculture sector
    Baines, James
    Edwards, Peter
    AQUACULTURE, 2018, 485 : 140 - 146
  • [5] Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate
    Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy
    Rifkin, Will
    Moffat, Kieren
    Louis, Winnifred
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2017, 54 : 137 - 146
  • [6] Conceptualising social licence to operate
    Stuart, Alice
    Bond, Alan
    Franco, Aldina M. A.
    Baker, Julia
    Gerrard, Chris
    Danino, Vittoria
    Jones, Kylie
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 85
  • [7] The emergence of social licence necessitates reforms in environmental regulation
    van Putten, Ingrid E.
    Cvitanovic, Christopher
    Fulton, Elizabeth
    Lacey, Justine
    Kelly, Rachel
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (03):
  • [8] Preconditions for social licence: The importance of information in initial engagement
    Zhang, Airong
    Measham, Thomas G.
    Moffat, Kieren
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 1559 - 1566
  • [9] ENCROACHMENT OF SOCIAL LICENCE IN AUSTRALIA'S TRADE AND INVESTMENT
    Ghori, Umair
    UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW, 2019, 46 (01): : 55 - 89
  • [10] The social licence to operate: a critical review
    Moffat, Kieren
    Lacey, Justine
    Zhang, Airong
    Leipold, Sina
    FORESTRY, 2016, 89 (05): : 477 - 488