Simulation of cell cycle effects on DNA strand break induction due to α-particles

被引:0
|
作者
Ballisat, Laura [1 ]
De Sio, Chiara [1 ]
Beck, Lana [1 ]
Chambers, Anna L. [2 ]
Dillingham, Mark S. [2 ]
Guatelli, Susanna [3 ]
Sakata, Dousatsu [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Shi, Yuyao [1 ]
Duan, Jinyan [1 ]
Velthuis, Jaap [1 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Phys, Bristol, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Biochem, DNA Prot Interact Unit, Bristol, England
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys CMRP, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] Osaka Univ, Div Hlth Sci, Osaka 5650871, Japan
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2025年 / 129卷
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Geant4-DNA; Monte Carlo simulation; DNA damage; Cell cycle; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; DAMAGE; RADIATION; REPAIR; PROTONS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104871
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Understanding cell cycle variations in radiosensitivity is important for a-particle therapies. Differences are due to both repair response mechanisms and the quantity of initial radiation-induced DNA strand breaks. Genome compaction within the nucleus has been shown to impact the yield of strand breaks. Compaction changes during the cell cycle are therefore likely to contribute to radiosensitivity differences. Simulation allows the strand break yield to be calculated independently of repair mechanisms which would be challenging experimentally. Methods: Using Geant4 the impact of genome compaction changes on strand break induction due to a-particles was simulated. Genome compaction is considered to be described by three metrics: global base pair density, chromatin fibre packing fraction and chromosome condensation. Nuclei in the G1, S, G2 and M phases from two cancer cell lines and one normal cell line are simulated. Repair mechanisms are not considered to study only the impact of genome compaction changes. Results: The three compaction metrics have differing effects on the strand break yield. For all cell lines the strand break yield is greatest in G2 cells and least in G1 cells. More strand breaks are induced in the two cancer cell lines than in the normal cell line. Conclusions: Compaction of the genome affects the initial yield of strand breaks. Some radiosensitivity differences between cell lines can be attributed to genome compaction changes between the phases of the cell cycle. This study provides a basis for further analysis of how repair deficiencies impact radiation-induced lethality in normal and malignant cells.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rapid MCNP simulation of DNA double strand break (DSB) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for photons, neutrons, and light ions
    Stewart, Robert D.
    Streitmatter, Seth W.
    Argento, David C.
    Kirkby, Charles
    Goorley, John T.
    Moffitt, Greg
    Jevremovic, Tatjana
    Sandison, George A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (21) : 8249 - 8274
  • [42] DNA double-strand break induction in Ku80-deficient CHO cells following Boron Neutron Capture Reaction
    Kinashi, Yuko
    Takahashi, Sentaro
    Kashino, Genro
    Okayasu, Ryuichi
    Masunaga, Shinichiro
    Suzuki, Minoru
    Ono, Koji
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6
  • [43] NE-κB inhibition by dimethylaminoparthenolide radiosensitizes non-small-cell lung carcinoma by blocking DNA double-strand break repair
    Deraska, Peter, V
    O'Leary, Colin
    Reavis, Hunter D.
    Labe, Shelby
    Dinh, Tru-Khang
    Lazaro, Jean-Bernard
    Sweeney, Christopher
    D'Andre, Alan D.
    Kozono, David
    CELL DEATH DISCOVERY, 2018, 4
  • [44] E2F1 is involved in DNA single-strand break repair through cell-cycle-dependent upregulation of XRCC1 expression
    Jin, RongHua
    Sun, Yu
    Qi, Xiaodong
    Zhang, HongHai
    Zhang, YuLin
    Li, Ning
    Ding, Wei
    Chen, DeXi
    DNA REPAIR, 2011, 10 (09) : 926 - 933
  • [45] Cell cycle-dependent protein expression of mammalian homologs of yeast DNA double-strand break repair genes Rad51 and Rad52
    Chen, FQ
    Nastasi, A
    Shen, ZY
    Brenneman, M
    Crissman, H
    Chen, DJ
    MUTATION RESEARCH-DNA REPAIR, 1997, 384 (03): : 205 - 211
  • [46] Are Anaphase Events Really Irreversible? The Endmost Stages of Cell Division and the Paradox of the DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
    Machin, Felix
    Ayra-Plasencia, Jessel
    BIOESSAYS, 2020, 42 (07)
  • [47] Controlled DNA double-strand break induction in mice reveals post-damage transcriptome stability
    Kim, Jeongkyu
    Sturgill, David
    Tran, Andy D.
    Sinclair, David A.
    Oberdoerffer, Philipp
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (07)
  • [48] Importance of the cell cycle phase for the choice of the appropriate DSB repair pathway, for genome stability maintenance -: The trans-S double-strand break repair model
    Delacote, Fabien
    Lopez, Bernard S.
    CELL CYCLE, 2008, 7 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [49] EFFECTS OF HYPERTHERMIA ON THE REPAIR OF RADIATION-INDUCED DNA SINGLE-STRAND AND DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS IN DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAK REPAIR-DEFICIENT AND REPAIR-PROFICIENT CELL-LINES
    ILIAKIS, G
    SEANER, R
    OKAYASU, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 1990, 6 (04) : 813 - 833
  • [50] Influence of double-strand-break repair pathways on radiosensitivity throughout the cell cycle in CHO cells
    Hinz, JM
    Yamada, NA
    Salazar, EP
    Tebbs, RS
    Thompson, LH
    DNA REPAIR, 2005, 4 (07) : 782 - 792