Simulation of cell cycle effects on DNA strand break induction due to α-particles

被引:0
|
作者
Ballisat, Laura [1 ]
De Sio, Chiara [1 ]
Beck, Lana [1 ]
Chambers, Anna L. [2 ]
Dillingham, Mark S. [2 ]
Guatelli, Susanna [3 ]
Sakata, Dousatsu [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Shi, Yuyao [1 ]
Duan, Jinyan [1 ]
Velthuis, Jaap [1 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Phys, Bristol, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Biochem, DNA Prot Interact Unit, Bristol, England
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys CMRP, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] Osaka Univ, Div Hlth Sci, Osaka 5650871, Japan
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2025年 / 129卷
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Geant4-DNA; Monte Carlo simulation; DNA damage; Cell cycle; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; DAMAGE; RADIATION; REPAIR; PROTONS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104871
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Understanding cell cycle variations in radiosensitivity is important for a-particle therapies. Differences are due to both repair response mechanisms and the quantity of initial radiation-induced DNA strand breaks. Genome compaction within the nucleus has been shown to impact the yield of strand breaks. Compaction changes during the cell cycle are therefore likely to contribute to radiosensitivity differences. Simulation allows the strand break yield to be calculated independently of repair mechanisms which would be challenging experimentally. Methods: Using Geant4 the impact of genome compaction changes on strand break induction due to a-particles was simulated. Genome compaction is considered to be described by three metrics: global base pair density, chromatin fibre packing fraction and chromosome condensation. Nuclei in the G1, S, G2 and M phases from two cancer cell lines and one normal cell line are simulated. Repair mechanisms are not considered to study only the impact of genome compaction changes. Results: The three compaction metrics have differing effects on the strand break yield. For all cell lines the strand break yield is greatest in G2 cells and least in G1 cells. More strand breaks are induced in the two cancer cell lines than in the normal cell line. Conclusions: Compaction of the genome affects the initial yield of strand breaks. Some radiosensitivity differences between cell lines can be attributed to genome compaction changes between the phases of the cell cycle. This study provides a basis for further analysis of how repair deficiencies impact radiation-induced lethality in normal and malignant cells.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The extreme radiosensitivity of the squamous cell carcinoma SKX is due to a defect in double-strand break repair
    Kasten-Pisula, Ulla
    Menegakis, Apostolos
    Brammer, Ingo
    Borgmann, Kerstin
    Mansour, Wael Y.
    Degenhardt, Sarah
    Krause, Mechthild
    Schreiber, Andreas
    Dahm-Daphi, Jochen
    Petersen, Cordula
    Dikomey, Ekkehard
    Baumann, Michael
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 90 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [32] Rucaparib Treatment Alters p53 Oscillations in Single Cells to Enhance DNA-Double-Strand-Break-Induced Cell Cycle Arrest
    Hanson, Ryan L.
    Batchelor, Eric
    CELL REPORTS, 2020, 33 (02):
  • [33] Research on Monte Carlo Simulation of DNA Strand Break Induced by Low Energy Photon
    Jiang C.-X.
    Li C.-Y.
    Qiu R.
    Chen Y.-Z.
    Xie W.-Z.
    Wu Z.
    Li J.-L.
    Qiu, Rui (qiurui@tsinghua.edu.cn), 1600, Atomic Energy Press (51): : 916 - 921
  • [34] Depletion of tyrosyl DNA phosphodiesterase 2 activity enhances etoposide-mediated double-strand break formation and cell killing
    Kont, Yasemin Saygideger
    Dutta, Arijit
    Mallisetty, Apurva
    Mathew, Jeena
    Minas, Tsion
    Kraus, Christina
    Dhopeshwarkar, Priyanka
    Kallakury, Bhaskar
    Mitra, Sankar
    Uren, Aykut
    Adhikari, Sanjay
    DNA REPAIR, 2016, 43 : 38 - 47
  • [35] A Stochastic Model of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair Throughout the Cell Cycle
    Mohseni-Salehi, Fazeleh S.
    Zare-Mirakabad, Fatemeh
    Sadeghi, Mehdi
    Ghafouri-Fard, Soudeh
    BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 82 (01)
  • [36] Photosensitization by iodinated DNA minor groove binding ligands: Evaluation of DNA double-strand break induction and repair
    Briggs, Benjamin
    Ververis, Katherine
    Rodd, Annabelle L.
    Foong, Laura J. L.
    Da Silva, Fernando M.
    Karagiannis, Tom C.
    JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY B-BIOLOGY, 2011, 103 (02) : 145 - 152
  • [37] Measurement of X-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks at various stages of the cell cycle using the total fluorescence as a comet assay parameter
    Attia, Atef M. M.
    Nabil, Ghada M.
    Frankenberg, Dieter
    Frankenberg-Schwager, M.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2011, 80 (11) : 1178 - 1185
  • [38] Estimation of the radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks number by considering cell cycle and absorbed dose per cell nucleus
    Mori, Ryosuke
    Matsuya, Yusuke
    Yoshii, Yuji
    Date, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2018, 59 (03) : 253 - 260
  • [39] A limited number of double-strand DNA breaks is sufficient to delay cell cycle progression
    van den Berg, Jeroen
    Manjon, Anna G.
    Kielbassa, Karoline
    Feringa, Femke M.
    Freire, Raimundo
    Medema, Rene H.
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (19) : 10132 - 10144
  • [40] Cell cycle dependent DNA break increase in ataxia telangiectasia lymphoblasts after radiation exposure
    Humar, B
    Müller, H
    Scott, RJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY-MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2001, 54 (05): : 347 - 350