Advancing life cycle assessment of bioenergy crops with global land use models

被引:0
|
作者
Arvesen, Anders [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Humpenoeder, Florian [4 ]
Gutierrez, Tomas Navarrete [5 ]
Gibon, Thomas [5 ]
Baustert, Paul [5 ]
Dietrich, Jan Philipp [4 ]
Stadler, Konstantin [1 ,2 ]
Iordan, Cristina-Maria [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Luderer, Gunnar [4 ]
Popp, Alexander [4 ]
Cherubini, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Ind Ecol Programme, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Trondheim, Norway
[3] SINTEF Energy Res, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Potsdam, Germany
[5] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol LIST, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[6] SINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
life cycle assessment (LCA); land use and land use change (LULUC); integrated assessment model (IAM); climate change mitigation; sustainability assessment; second generation bioenergy; NEGATIVE EMISSIONS; MITIGATION; METHODOLOGY; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; VEGETATION; SCENARIOS; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1088/2515-7620/ad97ac
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioenergy crops can cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, yet often bring hard-to-quantify environmental impacts. We present an approach for integrating global land use modeling into life cycle assessment (LCA) to estimate effects of bioenergy crops. The approach involves methodological choices connected to time horizons, scenarios of GHG prices and socioeconomic pathways, and flexible data transfer between models. Land-use change emissions are treated as totals, avoiding uncertain separation into direct and indirect emissions. The land use model MAgPIE is used to generate scenarios up to 2070 of land use, GHG emissions, irrigation and fertilizer use with different scales of perennial grass bioenergy crop deployment. We find that land use-related CO2 emission for bioenergy range from 2 to 35 tonne TJ-1, depending on bioenergy demand, policy context, year and accounting method. GHG emissions per unit of bioenergy do not increase with bioenergy demand in presence of an emission tax. With a GHG price of 40 or 200 $ tonne-1 CO2, GHG per bioenergy remain similar if the demand is doubled. A carbon tax thus has a stronger effect on emissions than bioenergy demand. These findings suggest that even a relatively moderate GHG price (40 $ tonne-1 CO2) can prevent significant emissions, highlighting the critical role governance plays in securing the climate benefits of bioenergy. However, realizing these benefits in practice will depend on a coherent policy framework for pricing CO2 emissions from land-use change, which is currently absent. Overall, our approach addresses direct and indirect effects associated with irrigation, machinery fuel and fertilizer use as well as emissions. Thanks to a global spatial coverage and temporal dimension, it facilitates a systematic and consistent inclusion of indirect effects in a global analysis framework. Future research can build on our open-source data/software to study different regions, bioenergy products or impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
    Halog, Anthony
    Manik, Yosef
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (02) : 469 - 499
  • [32] Advancing Circularity Through Digital Transformation: Harnessing Life Cycle Assessment
    Koidis, Christos
    Kalaitzidis, Athanasios
    Tsampoulatidis, Ioannis
    Makavou, Kassandra
    Bantsos, Athanasios
    Aptalidis, Irodotos
    Achillas, Charisios
    Aidonis, Dimitrios
    SUPPLY CHAINS, PT II, ICSC 2024, 2025, 2111 : 14 - 25
  • [33] Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of Grain and Oilseed Crops: Review and Recommendations
    Bamber, Nicole
    Turner, Ian
    Dutta, Baishali
    Heidari, Mohammed Davoud
    Pelletier, Nathan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [34] Impact of building service life models on life cycle assessment
    Grant, Aneurin
    Ries, Robert
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2013, 41 (02) : 168 - 186
  • [35] Methods for global sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment
    Groen, Evelyne A.
    Bokkers, Eddie A. M.
    Heijungs, Reinout
    de Boer, Imke J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (07) : 1125 - 1137
  • [36] A global life cycle assessment for primary zinc production
    Eric Van Genderen
    Maggie Wildnauer
    Nick Santero
    Nadir Sidi
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 1580 - 1593
  • [37] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A DISTRIBUTED-SCALE THERMOCHEMICAL BIOENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM
    Gu, Hongmei
    Bergman, Richard
    WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 2016, 48 (02): : 129 - 141
  • [38] A global life cycle assessment for primary zinc production
    Van Genderen, Eric
    Wildnauer, Maggie
    Santero, Nick
    Sidi, Nadir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (11) : 1580 - 1593
  • [39] Global extinction probabilities of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine species groups for use in Life Cycle Assessment
    Verones, Francesca
    Kuipers, Koen
    Nunez, Montserrat
    Rosa, Francesca
    Scherer, Laura
    Marques, Alexandra
    Michelsen, Ottar
    Barbarossa, Valerio
    Jaffe, Benjamin
    Pfister, Stephan
    Dorber, Martin
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 142
  • [40] Life Cycle Information Models: Parameterized Linked Data Structures to Facilitate the Consistent Use of Life-Cycle Assessment in Decision Making
    Bhat, Chaitanya Ganesh
    Mukherjee, Amlan
    Meijer, Joep P. R.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING PART B-PAVEMENTS, 2021, 147 (04)