Advancing life cycle assessment of bioenergy crops with global land use models

被引:0
|
作者
Arvesen, Anders [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Humpenoeder, Florian [4 ]
Gutierrez, Tomas Navarrete [5 ]
Gibon, Thomas [5 ]
Baustert, Paul [5 ]
Dietrich, Jan Philipp [4 ]
Stadler, Konstantin [1 ,2 ]
Iordan, Cristina-Maria [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Luderer, Gunnar [4 ]
Popp, Alexander [4 ]
Cherubini, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Ind Ecol Programme, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Trondheim, Norway
[3] SINTEF Energy Res, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Potsdam, Germany
[5] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol LIST, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[6] SINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
life cycle assessment (LCA); land use and land use change (LULUC); integrated assessment model (IAM); climate change mitigation; sustainability assessment; second generation bioenergy; NEGATIVE EMISSIONS; MITIGATION; METHODOLOGY; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; VEGETATION; SCENARIOS; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1088/2515-7620/ad97ac
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioenergy crops can cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, yet often bring hard-to-quantify environmental impacts. We present an approach for integrating global land use modeling into life cycle assessment (LCA) to estimate effects of bioenergy crops. The approach involves methodological choices connected to time horizons, scenarios of GHG prices and socioeconomic pathways, and flexible data transfer between models. Land-use change emissions are treated as totals, avoiding uncertain separation into direct and indirect emissions. The land use model MAgPIE is used to generate scenarios up to 2070 of land use, GHG emissions, irrigation and fertilizer use with different scales of perennial grass bioenergy crop deployment. We find that land use-related CO2 emission for bioenergy range from 2 to 35 tonne TJ-1, depending on bioenergy demand, policy context, year and accounting method. GHG emissions per unit of bioenergy do not increase with bioenergy demand in presence of an emission tax. With a GHG price of 40 or 200 $ tonne-1 CO2, GHG per bioenergy remain similar if the demand is doubled. A carbon tax thus has a stronger effect on emissions than bioenergy demand. These findings suggest that even a relatively moderate GHG price (40 $ tonne-1 CO2) can prevent significant emissions, highlighting the critical role governance plays in securing the climate benefits of bioenergy. However, realizing these benefits in practice will depend on a coherent policy framework for pricing CO2 emissions from land-use change, which is currently absent. Overall, our approach addresses direct and indirect effects associated with irrigation, machinery fuel and fertilizer use as well as emissions. Thanks to a global spatial coverage and temporal dimension, it facilitates a systematic and consistent inclusion of indirect effects in a global analysis framework. Future research can build on our open-source data/software to study different regions, bioenergy products or impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land Use in Life Cycle Assessment: Global Characterization Factors Based on Regional and Global Potential Species Extinction
    de Baan, Laura
    Mutel, Christopher L.
    Curran, Michael
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Koellner, Thomas
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (16) : 9281 - 9290
  • [2] Life cycle sustainability assessment of crops in India
    Selvaraj, Ambika
    Gautam, Jagrati
    Verma, Shikhar
    Verma, Gaurav
    Jain, Siddhant
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 3
  • [3] Bioenergy and global land-use change
    Rajcaniova, Miroslava
    Kancs, d'Artis
    Ciaian, Pavel
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 (26) : 3163 - 3179
  • [4] Land use and biodiversity indicators for Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    Schenck, RC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2001, 6 (02) : 114 - 117
  • [5] Land use and biodiversity indicators for life cycle impact assessment
    Rita C. Schenck
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2001, 6 (2) : 114 - 117
  • [6] On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment
    Yang, Yi
    Heijungs, Reinout
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (04) : 751 - 758
  • [7] Impact Assessment of Biodiversity and Carbon Pools from Land Use and Land Use Changes in Life Cycle Assessment, Exemplified with Forestry Operations in Norway
    Michelsen, Ottar
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 (02) : 231 - 242
  • [8] Global characterization factors for terrestrial biodiversity impacts of future land inundation in Life Cycle Assessment
    Dorber, Martin
    Kuipers, Koen
    Verones, Francesca
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 712
  • [9] Global land-use and sustainability implications of enhanced bioenergy import of China
    Wu, Yazhen
    Deppermann, Andre
    Havlik, Petr
    Frank, Stefan
    Ren, Ming
    Zhao, Hao
    Ma, Lin
    Fang, Chen
    Chen, Qi
    Dai, Hancheng
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 336
  • [10] A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment
    Cucurachi, S.
    Borgonovo, E.
    Heijungs, R.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2016, 36 (02) : 357 - 377