Patients Undergoing Manipulation under Anesthesia following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are Their Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Inferior?

被引:0
作者
Sirignano, Michael N. [1 ]
Rowe, Robert S. [2 ]
Gainer, James C. [1 ]
Royster, Brett W. [2 ]
Smith, Langan S. [3 ]
Altman, Kyle M. [1 ]
Yakkanti, Madhusudhan R. [4 ]
Malkani, Arthur L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Louisville, KY USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Louisville, KY USA
[3] Jewish Hosp, ULP Orthoped, UofL Hlth, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Louisville Orthopaed Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; manipulation under anesthesia; range of motion; patient-reported outcome measures; satisfaction; ACQUIRED IDIOPATHIC STIFFNESS; RISK-FACTORS; ARTHROFIBROSIS; MOTION; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; OPTIONS; FLEXION; RANGE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1055/a-2509-3109
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to decreased function and patient dissatisfaction. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is often performed to improve range of motion (ROM); however, there is no consensus on indications or timing. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients who underwent MUA versus those with an uncomplicated postoperative course following primary TKA. This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of 116 consecutive patients who underwent MUA from 2013 to 2019 following primary TKA due to stiffness. Indication for MUA was failure to achieve 105 degrees of knee flexion at 6 weeks following surgery. Five patients underwent revision surgery and 15 patients from the MUA group were excluded: 12 lost to follow-up and 3 deaths. The remaining 96 MUA patients were matched to 288 TKAs who did not require MUA or revision, all with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients who underwent MUA were younger (60.7 vs. 66.3 years, p < 0.001) and had less preoperative knee flexion (105.4 vs. 110.7 degrees, p < 0.001). There were five (4.9%) revisions in the MUA group: two instability, two chronic pain, and one arthrofibrosis. There were no differences between the groups with respect to postoperative Knee Society Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Forgotten Joint Score-12, satisfaction, or complications. Satisfaction rates were 88.5% among MUA patients and 89.6% among non-MUA patients ( p = 1.0). Patients undergoing MUA following TKA, using the criteria of failure to achieve 105 degrees of flexion by 6 weeks postoperatively, were able to achieve similar PROMs and satisfaction compared with a control group with a low incidence of revision due to persistent arthrofibrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 414
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty - Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision [J].
Kim, J ;
Nelson, CL ;
Lotke, PA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (07) :1479-1484
[22]   Risk factors for manipulation under anaesthesia after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Knapp, P. ;
Weishuhn, L. ;
Pizzimenti, N. ;
Markel, D. C. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (06) :66-72
[23]   Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Mowat, Fionna ;
Halpern, Michael .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) :780-785
[24]   Future Young Patient Demand for Primary and Revision Joint Replacement: National Projections from 2010 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven M. ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Zhao, Ke ;
Kelly, Michael ;
Bozic, Kevin J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (10) :2606-2612
[25]   Does the severity or cause of preoperative stiffness affect the clinical results and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty? [J].
Lee, Seung Ah ;
Kang, Seung-Baik ;
Chang, Chong Bum ;
Chang, Moon Jong ;
Kim, Young Jun ;
Song, Min Kyu ;
Jeong, Jin Hwa .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10)
[26]   The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis [J].
Lee, Wu Chean ;
Kwan, Yu Heng ;
Chong, Hwei Chi ;
Yeo, Seng Jin .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (11) :3354-3359
[27]   Surgical options for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee [J].
Luetzner, Joerg ;
Kasten, Philip ;
Guenther, Klaus-Peter ;
Kirschner, Stephan .
NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 5 (06) :309-316
[28]   What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement? [J].
Lyman, Stephen ;
Lee, Yuo-Yu ;
McLawhorn, Alexander S. ;
Islam, Wasif ;
MacLean, Catherine H. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (12) :2432-2441
[29]   The stiff total knee arthroplasty - Evaluation and management [J].
Maloney, WJ .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (04) :71-73
[30]   Timing of manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Mamarelis, Georgios ;
Kumar, Karadi Hari Sunil ;
Khanduja, Vikas .
ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (20)