Understanding the Ethics of Generative AI: Established and New Ethical Principles

被引:0
作者
Laine, Joakim [1 ]
Minkkinen, Matti [1 ]
Mantymaki, Matti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Informat Syst Sci, Turku, Finland
来源
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2025年 / 56卷
关键词
Generative AI; GenAI; Artificial Intelligence; AI; Large Language Models; AI Chatbots; AI Ethics; AI Auditing; AI Governance; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; KNOWLEDGE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; CHATGPT;
D O I
10.17705/1CAIS.05601
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This scoping review develops a conceptual synthesis of the ethics principles of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs). In regard to the emerging literature on GenAI, we explore 1) how established AI ethics principles are presented and 2) what new ethical principles have surfaced. The results indicate that established ethical principles continue to be relevant for GenAI systems but their salience and interpretation may shift, and that there is a need to recognize new principles in these systems. We identify six GenAI ethics principles: 1) respect for intellectual property, 2) truthfulness, 3) robustness, 4) recognition of malicious uses, 5) sociocultural responsibility, and 6) human-centric design. Addressing the challenge of satisfying multiple principles simultaneously, we suggest three meta-principles: categorizing and ranking principles to distinguish fundamental from supporting ones, mapping contradictions between principle pairs to understand their nature, and implementing continuous monitoring of fundamental principles due to the evolving nature of GenAI systems and their applications. To conclude, we suggest increased research emphasis on complementary ethics approaches to principlism, ethical tensions between different ethical viewpoints, end-user perspectives on the explainability and understanding of GenAI, and the salience of ethics principles to various GenAI stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Adamopoulou E., 2020, AIAI 2020, V584, P373, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_31, 10.1007/978-3-030-49186-431, 10.1007978-3-030-49186-431]
[2]   Artifiicial Intelligence in Information Systems: State of the Art and Research Roadmap [J].
Agerfalk, Par J. ;
Conboy, Kieran ;
Crowston, Kevin ;
Lundstrom, Jenny S. Z. Eriksson ;
Jarvenpaa, Sirkka ;
Ram, Sudha ;
Mikalef, Patrick .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 50 (01) :420-438
[3]   A Knowledge Management Perspective of Generative Artificial Intelligence [J].
Alavi, Maryam ;
Leidner, Dorothy E. ;
Mousavi, Reza .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 25 (01) :1-12
[4]  
Bale S., 2023, International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, V12, P697
[5]   Navigating Generative Artificial Intelligence Promises and Perils for Knowledge and Creative Work [J].
Benbya, Hind ;
Strich, Franz ;
Tamm, Toomas .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 25 (01) :23-36
[6]  
Berente N., 2021, MIS Quarterly, V45, P1433, DOI DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2021/16274
[7]   AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas [J].
Birkstedt, Teemu ;
Minkkinen, Matti ;
Tandon, Anushree ;
Mantymaki, Matti .
INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (07) :133-167
[8]   The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us [J].
Brown, Shea ;
Davidovic, Jovana ;
Hasan, Ali .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2021, 8 (01)
[9]   Algorithmic Management: Its Implications for Information Systems Research [J].
Cameron, Lindsey ;
Lamers, Laura ;
Leicht-Deobald, Ulrich ;
Lutz, Christoph ;
Meijerink, Jeroen .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 52 :518-537
[10]  
Cao YH, 2023, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2303.04226, 10.48550/arXiv.2303.04226, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2303.04226]