Terms for describing atmospheric deposition of substances on surfaces

被引:0
|
作者
Ianchenko, Natalia I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Irkutsk Natl Res Tech Univ, 83 Lermontov St, Irkutsk 664074, Russia
来源
BULLETIN OF THE TOMSK POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY-GEO ASSETS ENGINEERING | 2024年 / 335卷 / 09期
关键词
snow cover; atmospheric precipitation; load; intensity; precipitation density; flux; SNOW;
D O I
10.18799/24131830/2024/9/4833
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Relevance. The need to assess the state of the environment based on the use of terminology for quantitative chemical characteristics of the underlying surface as a result of deposition of pollutants in the composition of wet and dry fallout from the atmosphere. Aim. This study can be a source of information about the terminology used to describe the state of the underlying surface during the deposition of substances from the atmosphere, with links to scientific and technical literature. Methods. Review of some scientific and technical literature and an attempt to select terms used to quantify the ecological state of the underlying surface after the arrival of substances as part of dry and wet deposition from the atmosphere, depending on the sampling method. Results and conclusions. The author has carried out an analysis of the scientific and technical literature and defined the terms applied to a quantity that has the dimension mass/area*time for assessing the ecological state of the snow cover, such as specific reserve (surface density), deposition density, atmospheric deposition density, precipitation intensity pollutant, daily deposition of chemical elements, technogenic load, dust load, pollution load (element), mass load, gas-aerosol load, technogenic pressure module, input module, atmospheric fallout module, mass of the determined component received at unit area, flux obtained on the basis of sampling during snow chemical survey. An analysis of the entific and technical literature was also carried out and the terms applied to a value with the same dimension mass/area*time were defined to assess the ecological state of the underlying surface during the deposition of substances from the atmosphere, such as "fallout density", "atmospheric fallout density", "pollutant fallout intensity", "aggravating substance", "precipitation", "critical load", "flow" obtained based on sample collection using plates, cuvettes, collections.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 230
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEPOSITION VELOCITIES OF PARTICULATE SUBSTANCES ON DIFFERENT SURFACES
    MULLER, J
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1990, 21 : S197 - S199
  • [2] Atmospheric deposition of acidifying and eutrophicating substances in dune slacks
    Sival, FP
    Strijkstra-Kalk, M
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1999, 116 (3-4): : 461 - 477
  • [3] Atmospheric Deposition of Acidifying and Eutrophicating Substances in Dune Slacks
    Francisca P. Sival
    Magda Strijkstra-Kalk
    Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1999, 116 : 461 - 477
  • [4] SUDBURY SMELTER IMPACT ON ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION OF ACIDIC SUBSTANCES IN ONTARIO
    LUSIS, MA
    TANG, AJS
    CHAN, WH
    YAP, D
    KURTZ, J
    MISRA, PK
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1986, 30 (3-4): : 897 - 908
  • [5] DESCRIBING SURFACES
    BRADY, M
    PONCE, J
    YUILLE, A
    ASADA, H
    COMPUTER VISION GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1985, 32 (01): : 1 - 28
  • [6] Atmospheric dry deposition to leaf surfaces at a rural site of India
    Gupta, A
    Kumar, R
    Kumari, KM
    Srivastava, SS
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2004, 55 (08) : 1097 - 1107
  • [7] Atmospheric Aerosol Deposition on Snow Surfaces and Its Effect on Albedo
    Aoki, Teruo
    Motoyoshi, Hiroki
    Kodama, Yuji
    Yasunari, Teppei J.
    Sugiura, Konosuke
    Kobayashi, Hiroshi
    SOLA, 2006, 2 : 13 - 16
  • [8] MECHANISMS OF WET AND DRY DEPOSITION OF ATMOSPHERIC CONTAMINANTS TO SNOW SURFACES
    DAVIDSON, CI
    ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD IN GLACIERS AND ICE SHEETS, 1989, 8 : 29 - 51
  • [9] Influence of extracellular polymeric substances on deposition and redeposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to surfaces
    Gómez-Suárez, C
    Pasma, J
    van der Borden, AJ
    Wingender, J
    Flemming, HC
    Busscher, HJ
    van der Mei, HC
    MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2002, 148 : 1161 - 1169
  • [10] Describing a group in positive terms reduces prejudice less effectively than describing it in positive and negative terms
    Brauer, Markus
    Er-rafiy, Abdelatif
    Kawakami, Kerry
    Phills, Curtis E.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 48 (03) : 757 - 761