Secondary science teachers' conceptualizations and modifications to support equitable participation in a co-designed computational thinking lesson

被引:0
|
作者
Levy, Marissa [1 ]
Peel, Amanda [2 ]
Zhao, Lexie [1 ]
Lagrassa, Nicholas [1 ]
Horn, Michael S. [1 ]
Wilensky, Uri [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Educ & Social Policy, Dept Learning Sci, Evanston, IL USA
[2] New Mexico State Univ, Coll Hlth Educ & Social Transformat, Sch Teacher Preparat Adm & Leadership, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
computational thinking; equity; in-service teachers; secondary science; EDUCATION; ENGAGEMENT; IDENTITY; CULTURE; K-12;
D O I
10.1002/tea.21998
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Increasing access to computational ideas and practices is one important reason to integrate computational thinking (CT) in science classrooms. While integrating CT into science classrooms broadens exposure to computing, it may not be enough to ensure equitable participation in the science classroom. Equitable participation is crucial because providing students with an environment in which they are able to fully engage and participate in science and computing practices empowers students to learn and continue pursuing CT and science. To foreground equitable participation in CT-integrated curricula, we undertook a research project in which researchers and teachers examined teacher conceptualizations of equitable participation and how teachers design for equitable participation by modifying a lesson that introduces computational modeling in science. The following research questions guided the study: (1) What are teachers' conceptualizations of equitable participation? (2) How do teachers design for equitable participation through co-design of a CT-integrated unit? Our findings suggest that teachers conceptualized and designed for equitable participation in the context of a CT-integrated curriculum across three primary dimensions: accessibility, inclusion, and relevancy. Our contributions to the field of science teaching and learning are twofold: (1) obtaining an initial understanding of how teachers think about and design for equitable participation is crucial in order to support teachers in their pursuit of creating equitable learning experiences for CT and science learners, and (2) our findings show that we can study teacher conceptualizations and their design choices by examining specific modifications to a CT-integrated science curriculum. Implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] What's Computational Thinking?: Secondary Science Teachers' Conceptualizations of Computational Thinking (CT) and Perceived Barriers to CT Integration
    Kite, Vance
    Park, Soonhye
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2023, 34 (04) : 391 - 414
  • [2] What's Computational Thinking?: Secondary Science Teachers' Conceptualizations of Computational Thinking (CT) and Perceived Barriers to CT Integration
    Kite, Vance
    Park, Soonhye
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2022,
  • [3] Run, Llama, Run: A Computational Thinking Game for K-5 Students Designed to Support Equitable Access
    Koornneef, Stacey A.
    Bradbury, Jeremy S.
    Miljanovic, Michael A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 54TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, VOL 2, SIGCSE 2023, 2023, : 1395 - 1395
  • [4] Context matters: Secondary science teachers' integration of process-based, unplugged computational thinking into science curriculum
    Kite, Vance
    Park, Soonhye
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2024, 61 (01) : 203 - 227
  • [5] Enacting Co-Designed Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Curriculum Units: A Case of Secondary Science Teacher Learning
    Friedrichsen, Patricia J.
    Ke, Li
    Sadler, Troy D.
    Zangori, Laura
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2021, 32 (01) : 85 - 106
  • [6] Bebras-inspired Computational Thinking Primary School Resources Co-created by Computer Science Academics and Teachers
    Lehtimaki, Taina
    Monahan, Rosemary
    Mooney, Aidan
    Casey, Kevin
    Naughton, Thomas J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, ITICSE 2022, VOL 1, 2022, : 207 - 213