The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores

被引:1
作者
Huang, Tzu-Heng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wei-Ming [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Ke, Hung-Lung [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Li, Ching-Chia [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Wen-Jeng [3 ,4 ,6 ,8 ,9 ]
Yeh, Hsin-Chih [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Wang, Yen-Chun [3 ]
Lee, Hsiang-Ying [3 ,4 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
[5] Minist Hlth & Welf Pingtung Hosp, Dept Urol, Pingtung 90054, Taiwan
[6] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Cohort Res Ctr, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
[7] Kaohsiung Municipal Tatung Hosp, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung 80145, Taiwan
[8] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Grad Inst Med, Coll Med, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
[9] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Grad Inst Clin Med, Coll Med, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
关键词
Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Prostate volume; ANTIGEN DENSITY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PSA DENSITY; VOLUME; MEN; RISK; PREDICTION; SIZE; FEATURES; GRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfma.2024.03.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the discrepancy in between biopsy Gleason score (GS) and radical prostatectomy GS in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Methods: 341 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011/04 to 2020/12 were identified. 102 Patients with initial GS of six after biopsy were enrolled. Preoperative clinical variables and pathological variables were also obtained and assessed. The optimal cut-off points for significant continuous variables were identified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Upgrading was observed in 63 patients and non-upgrading in 39 patients. In the multiple variables assessed, smaller prostate volume (PV) (p value = 0.0007), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) (p value = 0.0055), positive surgical margins (p value = 0.0062) and pathological perineural invasion (p value = 0.0038) were significant predictors of GS upgrading. To further explore preclinical variables, a cut-off value for PV (<= 38 ml, p value = 0.0017) and PSAD (>= 0.26 ng/ml2, p value = 0.0013) were identified to be associated with GS upgrading. Conclusion: Smaller PV and elevated PSAD are associated with increased risk of GS upgrading, whereas lead-time bias is not. A cut-off value of PV < 38 ml and PSAD > 0.26 ng/ml2 were further identified to be associated with pathological GS upgrading.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 150
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Risk factors for Gleason Score upgrading following radical prostatectomy
    Alchin, David R.
    Murphy, Declan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2017, 69 (05) : 459 - 465
  • [2] Factors influencing disease progression of prostate cancer under active surveillance: a McGill University Health Center cohort
    Barayan, Ghassan A.
    Brimo, Fadi
    Begin, Louis R.
    Hanley, James A.
    Liu, Zhihui
    Kassouf, Wassim
    Aprikian, Armen G.
    Tanguay, Simon
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (6B) : E99 - E104
  • [3] Correlation between serum prostate specific antigen and prostate volume in Taiwanese men with biopsy proven benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Chang, Yu-Lung
    Lin, Alex T. L.
    Chen, Kuang-Kuo
    Chang, Yen-Hwa
    Wu, Howard H. H.
    Kuo, Junne-Yih
    Huang, William J. S.
    Lu, Shing-Hwa
    Hsu, Yen-Shen
    Chung, Hsiao-Jen
    Chang, Shyh-Chyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (01) : 196 - 199
  • [4] Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
    Chung, Mun Su
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Dong Hoon
    Chung, Byung Ha
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (04) : 902 - 906
  • [5] Mesenchymal-epithelial interaction techniques
    Cunha, Gerald R.
    Baskin, Lawrence
    [J]. DIFFERENTIATION, 2016, 91 (4-5) : 20 - 27
  • [6] POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF TEMPORAL FACTORS IN ANDROGENIC RESPONSIVENESS OF UROGENITAL TISSUE RECOMBINANTS FROM WILD-TYPE AND ANDROGEN-INSENSITIVE (TFM) MICE
    CUNHA, GR
    LUNG, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY, 1978, 205 (02): : 181 - 193
  • [7] Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: A search database study
    Freedland, SJ
    Isaacs, WB
    Platz, EA
    Terris, MK
    Aronson, WJ
    Amling, CL
    Presti, JC
    Kane, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) : 7546 - 7554
  • [8] Obesity and prostate cancer: Making sense out of apparently conflicting data
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Platz, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2007, 29 : 88 - 97
  • [9] Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gan, Shu
    Liu, Jian
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Xiang, Songtao
    Gu, Chiming
    Li, Siyi
    Wang, Shusheng
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2022, 63 (04) : 407 - 414
  • [10] Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading
    Gershman, Boris
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Olumi, Aria F.
    Young, Robert H.
    McDougal, W. Scott
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (07) : 1033 - 1037