Factors Affecting Mammalian Occupancy and Species Richness in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal

被引:0
|
作者
Ghimirey, Yadav [1 ,2 ]
Acharya, Raju [1 ]
Mintz, Jeffrey [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Friends Nat, Kathmandu, Nepal
[3] Univ Florida, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2024年 / 14卷 / 11期
关键词
Bayesian hierarchical model; detection probability; imperfect detection; mammal community; multi-species occupancy models; species richness; ELEVATION GRADIENT; HUMAN DISTURBANCE; CLOUDED LEOPARD; HABITAT USE; DIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE; PERFORMANCE; LANDSCAPE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.70572
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species richness is an important metric used for undertaking conservation management decisions. However, species richness estimates are influenced by species detection probabilities, with potential to entirely overlook species during surveys. Occupancy models which account for imperfect detection provide unbiased estimates, ensuring accurate estimates of richness. We carried out a camera trap survey in the mountains of north-central Nepal during 2017 and documented a total of 21 mammal species. Here, we used multi-species occupancy models within a Bayesian hierarchical framework to reassess our initial species richness estimate and to understand the influence of environmental covariates on occupancy and species richness of mammals in the area. Our model estimated the mean species richness was similar to 26 species (95% CRI: 21-36 species), suggesting we might have missed similar to 5 species during the survey. The mean probability of occupancy and detection of mammal species were estimated to be 0.28(95%CRI:0.08-0.46) and 0.02 (95% CRI:0.01-0.03) respectively. Mammalian species richness of the area had an anticipated positive relationship with tree canopy cover (beta=1.908,95%CI=0.989-2.827,p=1.95e-04) though its positive relationship with anthropogenic disturbance was surprising (beta=1.339,95%CI=0.334-2.344,p=0.012). Mammalian species richness had a quadratic relationship with elevation as is expected. This research contributes to baseline information of the mammal community ecology in north-central Nepal and supports the need for future multi-season surveys to understand the influence of temporal factors on mammalian community and species richness in the area.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors affecting site occupancy by woodland bird species of conservation concern
    Montague-Drake, R. M.
    Lindenmayer, D. B.
    Cunningham, R. B.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (12) : 2896 - 2903
  • [22] DIET OF THE SNOW LEOPARD (PANTHERA-UNCIA) IN THE ANNAPURNA CONSERVATION AREA, NEPAL
    OLI, MK
    TAYLOR, IR
    ROGERS, ME
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1993, 231 : 365 - 370
  • [23] Integrated conservation and development project life cycles in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: Is development overpowering conservation?
    Baral, Nabin
    Stern, Marc J.
    Heinen, Joel T.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2007, 16 (10) : 2903 - 2917
  • [24] Spatially Variable Glacier Changes in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal, 2000 to 2016
    Lovell, Arminel M.
    Carr, J. Rachel
    Stokes, Chris R.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [25] Examining Marginalized Communities and Local Conservation Institutions: The Case of Nepal’s Annapurna Conservation Area
    Smriti Dahal
    Sanjay K. Nepal
    Michael A. Schuett
    Environmental Management, 2014, 53 : 219 - 230
  • [26] Visitors' willingness to pay for snow leopard Panthera uncia conservation in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Schutgens, Maurice G.
    Hanson, Jonathan H.
    Baral, Nabin
    Ale, Som B.
    ORYX, 2019, 53 (04) : 633 - 642
  • [27] Growth, Collapse, and Reorganization of the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: an Analysis of Institutional Resilience
    Baral, Nabin
    Stern, Marc J.
    Heinen, Joel T.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2010, 15 (03):
  • [28] Factors affecting species richness and distribution spatially and temporally within a protected area using multi-season occupancy models
    Moore, J. F.
    Hines, J. E.
    Mulindahabi, F.
    Masozera, M. K.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 22 (05) : 503 - 514
  • [29] Looking back and looking ahead: local empowerment and governance in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Baral, Nabin
    Stern, Marc J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 37 (01) : 54 - 63
  • [30] PROTECTED AREAS AND ROAD DEVELOPMENT: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSES IN THE ANNAPURNA CONSERVATION AREA, NEPAL
    Lama, Anu Kumari
    Job, Hubert
    ERDKUNDE, 2014, 68 (04) : 229 - 250