Factors Affecting Mammalian Occupancy and Species Richness in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal

被引:0
|
作者
Ghimirey, Yadav [1 ,2 ]
Acharya, Raju [1 ]
Mintz, Jeffrey [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Friends Nat, Kathmandu, Nepal
[3] Univ Florida, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2024年 / 14卷 / 11期
关键词
Bayesian hierarchical model; detection probability; imperfect detection; mammal community; multi-species occupancy models; species richness; ELEVATION GRADIENT; HUMAN DISTURBANCE; CLOUDED LEOPARD; HABITAT USE; DIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE; PERFORMANCE; LANDSCAPE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.70572
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species richness is an important metric used for undertaking conservation management decisions. However, species richness estimates are influenced by species detection probabilities, with potential to entirely overlook species during surveys. Occupancy models which account for imperfect detection provide unbiased estimates, ensuring accurate estimates of richness. We carried out a camera trap survey in the mountains of north-central Nepal during 2017 and documented a total of 21 mammal species. Here, we used multi-species occupancy models within a Bayesian hierarchical framework to reassess our initial species richness estimate and to understand the influence of environmental covariates on occupancy and species richness of mammals in the area. Our model estimated the mean species richness was similar to 26 species (95% CRI: 21-36 species), suggesting we might have missed similar to 5 species during the survey. The mean probability of occupancy and detection of mammal species were estimated to be 0.28(95%CRI:0.08-0.46) and 0.02 (95% CRI:0.01-0.03) respectively. Mammalian species richness of the area had an anticipated positive relationship with tree canopy cover (beta=1.908,95%CI=0.989-2.827,p=1.95e-04) though its positive relationship with anthropogenic disturbance was surprising (beta=1.339,95%CI=0.334-2.344,p=0.012). Mammalian species richness had a quadratic relationship with elevation as is expected. This research contributes to baseline information of the mammal community ecology in north-central Nepal and supports the need for future multi-season surveys to understand the influence of temporal factors on mammalian community and species richness in the area.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Small carnivores in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Appel, Angelika
    Werhahn, Geraldine
    Acharya, Raju
    Ghimirey, Yadav
    Adhikary, Bidhan
    VERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2013, 63 (01) : 111 - 121
  • [2] Local Responses to Participatory Conservation in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Damodar Khadka
    Sanjay K. Nepal
    Environmental Management, 2010, 45 : 351 - 362
  • [3] Local Responses to Participatory Conservation in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Khadka, Damodar
    Nepal, Sanjay K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 45 (02) : 351 - 362
  • [4] Evaluation and resilience of ecotourism in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Baral, Nabin
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 84 - 92
  • [5] Conservation for whom? Parks, people, and tourism in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Dahal, Smriti
    Nepal, Sanjay
    POLITICAL ECOLOGY AND TOURISM, 2016, : 130 - 144
  • [6] Capital Stocks and Organizational Resilience in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Baral, Nabin
    Stern, Marc J.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2011, 24 (10) : 1011 - 1026
  • [7] Evaluating local benefits from conservation in Nepal's Annapurna Conservation Area
    Spiteri, Arian
    Nepal, Sanjay K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 42 (03) : 391 - 401
  • [8] Effectiveness of community involvement in delivering conservation benefits to the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
    Bajracharya, SB
    Furley, PA
    Newton, AC
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 32 (03) : 239 - 247
  • [9] Evaluating Local Benefits from Conservation in Nepal’s Annapurna Conservation Area
    Arian Spiteri
    Sanjay K. Nepal
    Environmental Management, 2008, 42 : 391 - 401
  • [10] Role of ecotourism in environmental conservation and socioeconomic development in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal
    Anup, K. C.
    Rijal, Kedar
    Sapkota, Ramesh Prasad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (03): : 251 - 258