Instrument to measure the perceptions of software development communities regarding communication, coordination and cooperation: Result of validation through expert judgment

被引:0
作者
Brieva, Eydy del Carmen Suarez [1 ]
Calvache, Cesar de Jesus Pardo [2 ]
Eraso, Hugo Armando Ordonez [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Popular Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia
[2] Univ Cauca, Res Grp GTI, Popayan, Colombia
关键词
Anti-patterns; Fleiss' Kappa coefficient; Communication; Cooperation; Coordination; Software communities; Sociotechnical Congruence (STC); Social debt; Expert judgment; Community smells; SOCIOTECHNICAL CONGRUENCE; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.17981/ingecuc.20.1.2024.10
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Introduction: Software development is a sociotechnical activity that requires both social and technical factors to achieve any proposed objective. These factors characterize Sociotechnical Congruence (STC), which focuses on the proper use of soft skills such as coordination, communication, and cooperation within software development teams. Objective: The objective of this study is to introduce a measurement tool that enables the assessment of perceptions among members of a software development community, based on 42 questions formulated across three dimensions: communication, cooperation, and coordination. Method: The validation of the measurement instrument was carried out through expert judgment. Nine professionals were selected to evaluate the instrument using four quality criteria: sufficiency, clarity, relevance, and coherence. To determine the agreement among the experts, the Fleiss' Kappa coefficient was employed, and Landis and Koch's criteria were applied to measure the degree of concordance. Results: The agreement strength for each dimension was substantial and nearly perfect. Considerable agreement was identified for the sufficiency, coherence, and clarity quality criteria, with clarity having the highest coefficient (0.85). The relevance quality criterion showed moderate agreement, being the lowest (0.583). A significance level of 5% was considered, with the clarity quality criterion being the most significant, with a p-value of 0.02. Conclusions: Once the adjustments to the instrument are made, it can be used to measure perceptions of the dimensions: communication, cooperation, and coordination within software development communities.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 134
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The Pandora's box of social, process, and people debts in software engineering [J].
Ahmad, Muhammad Ovais ;
Gustavsson, Tomas .
JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2024, 36 (02)
[2]  
Ahmed R., 2022, Shukor SM Fauzi 2, V49, P1
[3]   Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust [J].
Alsharo, Mohammad ;
Gregg, Dawn ;
Ramirez, Ronald .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 54 (04) :479-490
[4]   Community smells-The sources of social debt: A systematic literature review [J].
Caballero-Espinosa, Eduardo ;
Carver, Jeffrey C. ;
Stowers, Kimberly .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 153
[5]  
Almenara JC, 2013, EDUWEB-REV TECNOL IN, V7, P11
[6]  
Callejas-Cuervo M., 2017, Entramado, V13, P236, DOI [10.18041/entramado.2017v13n1.25125, DOI 10.18041/ENTRAMADO.2017V13N1.25125]
[7]  
Canto de Gante A. G., 2020, Rev. la Alta Tecnol. y Soc., V12, P38
[8]  
Gonzáles MEC, 2023, Revista Ecuatoriana de Psicología, V6, P109, DOI [10.33996/repsi.v6i15.93, 10.33996/repsi.v6i15.93, DOI 10.33996/REPSI.V6I15.93]
[9]  
Chau HTM, 2020, PROCEEDINGS, V8, DOI [10.46223/hcmcoujs.econ.en.8.2.164.2018, 10.46223/hcmcoujs.econ.en.8.2.164.2018, DOI 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.ECON.EN.8.2.164.2018]
[10]  
CORRAL Yadira., 2009, Revista Ciencias de la Educacion, V19, P228