Comparing reproductive outcomes between conventional in vitro fertilization and nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection in autologous embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System Study

被引:3
作者
Gingold, Julian A. [1 ]
Wu, Haotian [2 ]
Lieman, Harry [1 ]
Singh, Manvinder [1 ]
Jindal, Sangita [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Inst Reprod Med & Hlth, OB GYN & Womens Hlth, Hartsdale, NY USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY USA
来源
F&S REPORTS | 2024年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; assisted reproduction; national registry; non-male factor infertility; live birth rate; INFERTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.xfre.2023.10.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare clinical outcomes between nonindicated intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional insemination. Design: Autologous cycles performed from 2014-2017 were identified, excluding frozen oocyte cycles. Outcomes were compared between conventional insemination (in vitro fertilization [IVF]) and nonindiated ICSI and analyzed separately for fresh, frozen- thawed preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and frozen-thawed non-PGT cycles. Setting: US-based fertility clinics reporting to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Participants: A total of 187,520 patients underwent 318,930 cycles, 57,516 (18.0%) using conventional IVF and 261,414 ICSI (82.0%). Interventions: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with or without indications (male factor, prior fertilization failure or any PGT [2012 recommendations]/single-gene PGT [2020 recommendations]). Main Outcome Measures: Odds ratios (ORs) for live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were calculated after multivariable adjustment for maternal age, body mass index, infertility etiologies, prior IVF births, and number oocytes retrieved. Results: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was indicated in 151,627 (58.0%) of cycles according to 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee recommendations, and 108,895 (41.7%) according to 2020 recommendations. In multivariable models, nonindicated ICSI among fresh cycles was associated with reduced odds of completing a blastocyst-stage transfer (OR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.7, 0.75]; P< .001), resulting in reduced odds of live birth (OR, 0.80; 95% CI [0.78, 0.83]; P< .001). Among completed fresh transfers, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were comparable between nonindicated ICSI and IVF. Nonindicated ICSI in frozen-thawed cycles with PGT and without PGT was associated with comparable live birth and clinical pregnancy rates with IVF in multivariable models. Conclusion: Nonindicated ICSI was associated with reduced blastocyst availability in fresh cycles compared with IVF, leading to lower live birth rates. Outcomes from completed transfers were clinically comparable. (Fertil Steril Rep (R) 2024;5:23-32. (c) 2023 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Intracytoplasmic sperm injection overcomes previous fertilization failure with conventional in vitro fertilization [J].
Benadiva, CA ;
Nulsen, J ;
Siano, L ;
Jennings, J ;
Givargis, HB ;
Maier, D .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 72 (06) :1041-1044
[2]   Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Bhattacharya, S ;
Hamilton, MPR ;
Shaaban, M ;
Khalaf, Y ;
Seddler, M ;
Ghobara, T ;
Braude, P ;
Kennedy, R ;
Rutherford, A ;
Hartshorne, G ;
Templeton, A .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9274) :2075-2079
[3]   A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception [J].
Bonduelle, M ;
Wennerholm, UB ;
Loft, A ;
Tarlatzis, BC ;
Peters, C ;
Henriet, S ;
Mau, C ;
Victorin-Cederquist, A ;
Van Steirteghem, A ;
Balaska, A ;
Emberson, JR ;
Sutcliffe, AG .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (02) :413-419
[4]   Trends in Use of and Reproductive Outcomes Associated With Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection [J].
Boulet, Sheree L. ;
Mehta, Akanksha ;
Kissin, Dmitry M. ;
Warner, Lee ;
Kawwass, Jennifer F. ;
Jamieson, Denise J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (03) :255-263
[5]   Assisted hatching and intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not associated with improved outcomes in assisted reproduction cycles for diminished ovarian reserve: an analysis of cycles in the United States from 2004 to 2011 [J].
Butts, Samantha F. ;
Owen, Carter ;
Mainigi, Monica ;
Senapati, Suneeta ;
Seifer, David B. ;
Dokras, Anuja .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (04) :1041-U519
[6]  
Core RT., 2022, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[7]  
CTRS, 2019, 2019 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic and National Summary Report
[8]   Comparison of aneuploidy rates between conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split insemination cycles [J].
Deng, Jie ;
Kuyoro, Olutunmike ;
Zhao, Qianying ;
Behr, Barry ;
Lathi, Ruth B. .
F&S REPORTS, 2020, 1 (03) :277-281
[9]   Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for all or for a few? [J].
Franasiak, Jason M. ;
Polyzos, Nikolaos P. ;
Neves, Ana Raquel ;
Yovich, John Liu ;
Ho, Tuong M. ;
Vuong, Lan N. ;
Norman, Robert J. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 117 (02) :270-284
[10]   Intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs. conventional in vitro fertilization in patients with non-male factor infertility [J].
Iwamoto, Aya ;
Van Voorhis, Bradley J. ;
Summers, Karen M. ;
Sparks, Amy ;
Mancuso, Abigail C. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (03) :465-472