Participatory scenario planning: A social learning approach to build systems thinking and trust for sustainable environmental governance

被引:0
作者
Galang, Elson Ian Nyl Ebreo [1 ]
Bennett, Elena M. [1 ,2 ]
Hickey, Gordon M. [1 ]
Baird, Julia [3 ]
Harvey, Blane [2 ,4 ]
Sherren, Kate [5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, 21111 Lakeshore Rd, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Bieler Sch Environm, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Brock Univ, Environm Sustainabil Res Ctr, Dept Geog & Tourism Studies, St Catharines, ON, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Integrated Studies Educ, 3700 McTavish St, Montreal, PQ H3A 1Y2, Canada
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Studies, 6100 Univ Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Scenarios; Mixed methods; Empirical; Landscape; Bay of Fundy; PSP; Social learning; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADAPTATION; LESSONS; TOOL; ANTHROPOCENE; REFLECTIONS; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; EXPLORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103997
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Participatory Scenario Planning (PSP), the collaborative process of envisioning plausible futures, is a promising approach to aid environmental management and governance in the Anthropocene. Emerging scholarship on PSP emphasizes its potential for social learning to enhance knowledge, values, and competencies for more sustainable governance. However, empirical evidence that PSP leads to social learning is limited. We explored a PSP exercise for the Bay of Fundy landscape in Nova Scotia, Canada, to assess the degree and durability of three social learning effects among participants (n = 18): changes in systems thinking (cognitive effects), rational (also known as calculative) trust (relational effects), and environmental aspirations (normative effects). We implemented a mixed-methods explanatory design, starting with a quasi-experimental study of the learning effects followed by a qualitative exploration of the influence of composition, process design, and facilitation. Our findings from our case showed that the PSP had multiple positive social learning effects. It enhanced systems thinking by expanding actors' mental models of which parts of the landscape they perceive to be important for decision-making. It increased rational trust among those involved in the PSP. It shifted environmental aspirations from being outcomes-oriented (e.g., increasing tidal wetlands) toward being process-oriented (e.g., ensuring landscape multifunctionality). These significant learning effects lasted three months after participation in the PSP. Operational attributes, such as the diversity of participants, the activities implemented, and facilitation, were found to heavily influence these social learning effects in different ways.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Combining participatory scenario planning and systems modeling to identify drivers of future sustainability on the Mongolian Plateau
    Allington, Ginger R. H.
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    Chen, Jiquan
    Brown, Daniel G.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (02):
  • [2] Understanding normative foresight outcomes: Scenario development and the 'veil of ignorance' effect
    Andreescu, Liviu
    Gheorghiu, Radu
    Zulean, Marian
    Curaj, Adrian
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (04) : 711 - 722
  • [3] An Approach to Assess Learning Conditions, Effects and Outcomes in Environmental Governance
    Armitage, Derek
    Dzyundzyak, Angela
    Baird, Julia
    Bodin, Orjan
    Plummer, Ryan
    Schultz, Lisen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 28 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [4] Introducing Resilience Practice to Watershed Groups: What Are the Learning Effects?
    Baird, Julia
    Plummer, Ryan
    Moore, Michele-Lee
    Brandes, Oliver
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 29 (10) : 1214 - 1229
  • [5] Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation
    Baird, Julia
    Plummer, Ryan
    Haug, Constanze
    Huitema, Dave
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 27 : 51 - 63
  • [6] Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Solan, Martin
    Biggs, Reinette
    McPhearson, Timon
    Norstrom, Albert V.
    Olsson, Per
    Pereira, Laura
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara
    Biermann, Frank
    Carpenter, Stephen R.
    Ellis, Erle C.
    Hichert, Tanja
    Galaz, Victor
    Lahsen, Myanna
    Milkoreit, Manjana
    Lopez, Berta Martin
    Nicholas, Kimberly A.
    Preiser, Rika
    Vince, Gaia
    Vervoort, Joost M.
    Xu, Jianchu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (08) : 441 - 448
  • [7] Why global scenarios need ecology
    Bennett, EM
    Carpenter, SR
    Peterson, GD
    Cumming, GS
    Zurek, M
    Pingali, P
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 1 (06) : 322 - 329
  • [8] Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Satterfield, Terre
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2018, 11 (06):
  • [9] Community-based scenario planning: a process for vulnerability analysis and adaptation planning to social-ecological change in coastal communities
    Bennett, Nathan James
    Kadfak, Alin
    Dearden, Philip
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 18 (06) : 1771 - 1799
  • [10] Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning
    Berkes, Fikret
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)