Organisational tensions in introducing socially sustainable AI

被引:0
作者
Lanne, Marinka [1 ]
Nieminen, Mika [1 ]
Leikas, Jaana [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Visiokatu 4, POB 1300, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
AI ethics; AI sustainability; AI responsibility; Organisational tensions; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; BUSINESS MODELS; TRADE-OFFS; PARADOXES; RESPONSIBILITY; MANAGEMENT; PERSPECTIVE; DEMANDS; ETHICS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-025-02293-y
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The introduction of AI into an organisation is linked to many of its functions, changing not only the technical systems but also the organisation of work and the society around it. Technology is often introduced with efficiency goals in mind, but at the same time, the constantly evolving understanding of sustainable and responsible business raises questions about how to ensure socially sustainable, ethical and responsible development and deployment of AI. The introduction of new, complex technologies, combined with the increasing social complexity of the operating environment, can easily create conflicting demands and dilemmas for organisations. In this paper, we explore the organisational tensions in public and private organisations that are planning to deploy or have already experimented with AI. The aim of the study is to broaden the understanding of AI-related organisational tensions: what issues they cover and how they are described by the practitioners working with AI. The research methodology is a qualitative content analysis of transcribed interviews with AI development experts from 42 Finnish organisations. The results are divided into three categories: (1) tensions related to values, (2) tensions related to AI implementation, and (3) tensions related to AI impacts. A total of 12 pairs of tensions were identified within these categories. We argue that by identifying and understanding AI-related tensions, organisations can learn about the positive and negative social, environmental and economic impacts of AI. This awareness enables organisations to consider impacts in advance, focus attention on key issues and act in a more sustainable way when adopting AI.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D, 2021, NBER working paper series, Vw29247
  • [2] Achar S., 2022, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Eng., V16, P567
  • [3] Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations
    Aguilera, Ruth V.
    Rupp, Deborah E.
    Williams, Cynthia A.
    Ganapathi, Jyoti
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) : 836 - 863
  • [4] AI HLEG, 2019, European commission's high-level expert group on artificial intelligence. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI
  • [5] Designing for human rights in AI
    Aizenberg, Evgeni
    van den Hoven, Jeroen
    [J]. BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2020, 7 (02):
  • [6] Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation
    Andriopoulos, Constantine
    Lewis, Marianne W.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) : 696 - 717
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.2777/531856PUBLICATIONSOFFICE
  • [8] Ashrafi M, 2018, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V25, P672, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2018.1471628
  • [9] From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues
    Bansal, P
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (05) : 510 - 527
  • [10] SIMILAR BUT NOT THE SAME: DIFFERENTIATING CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY FROM CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
    Bansal, Pratima
    Song, Hee-Chan
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2017, 11 (01) : 105 - 149