Efficacy of different adhesive systems in bonding direct resin composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Saini, Ravinder S. [1 ]
Vyas, Rajesh [1 ]
Vaddamanu, Sunil Kumar [1 ]
Quadri, Syed Altafuddin [1 ]
Mosaddad, Seyed Ali [2 ,3 ]
Heboyan, Artak [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] King Khalid Univ, COAMS, Dept Allied Dent Hlth Sci, Abha, Saudi Arabia
[2] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Res Analyt, Chennai, India
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Yerevan State Med Univ Mkhitar Heratsi, Fac Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Yerevan, Armenia
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Tehran, Iran
关键词
STEP SELF-ETCH; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; REPAIR; EVOLUTION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1038/s41432-024-01095-3
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify and evaluate scholarly research on the efficacy, durability, and long-term stability of various adhesive systems used for bonding direct resin composite restorations and to identify factors influencing bonding performance, such as adhesive composition, application protocol, substrate type, and etching technique.Materials and methodsAn all-inclusive electronic database search for peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Dimensions, and the Cochrane Library for research articles investigating the effectiveness of different adhesive systems in direct resin composite restorations, excluding reviews, meta-analyses, opinion pieces, and case reports. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool (Robvis 2.0). Data were extracted and thematically analyzed, and quantitative data were statistically analyzed using Review Manager software. Dichotomous data were evaluated using the Mantel-Haenszel method, applying a random effects model and 95% confidence interval.ResultsThe database search yielded 1632 potential articles, of which 14 were included in this study. Several adhesive systems exhibit excellent tensile bond strength. In addition, the type of resin composite, adhesive system, and artificial aging significantly influenced the bonding performance of resin composite restorations. However, the failure rates were low in the different adhesive systems, showing comparable results between the two-step etch-and-rinse and one-step self-etch adhesive systems (p = 0.71). The results showed an overall trend of high bonding effectiveness with a low incidence of adverse events, such as postoperative sensitivity, adhesive failure, and fractures.ConclusionThe study results emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate adhesive systems based on clinical case requirements, restoration characteristics, and patient factors to enhance bonding efficacy, durability, and long-term stability.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 115
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Investigation on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prosthodontics [J].
Alshadidi, Abdulkhaliq Ali F. ;
Alshahrani, Ahid Amer ;
Aldosari, Lujain Ibrahim N. ;
Chaturvedi, Saurabh ;
Saini, Ravinder S. ;
Bin Hassan, Saeed Awod ;
Cicciu, Marco ;
Minervini, Giuseppe .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (08)
[2]   Influence of desensitizing procedures on adhesion of resin cements to dentin [J].
Atay, A. ;
Kara, O. ;
Kara, H. B. ;
Cal, E. ;
Usumez, A. .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (09) :1007-1016
[3]   The Evolution of Dental Materials over the Past Century: Silver and Gold to Tooth Color and Beyond [J].
Bayne, S. C. ;
Ferracane, J. L. ;
Marshall, G. W. ;
Marshall, S. J. ;
van Noort, R. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 98 (03) :257-265
[4]   Evolution of Aesthetic Dentistry [J].
Blatz, M. B. ;
Chiche, G. ;
Bahat, O. ;
Roblee, R. ;
Coachman, C. ;
Heymann, H. O. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 98 (12) :1294-1304
[5]  
Blum Igor Robert, 2018, Curr Oral Health Rep, V5, P264, DOI [10.1007/s40496-018-0191-1, 10.1007/s40496-018-0191-1]
[6]   Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin - a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial [J].
Carvalho, Andreia Assis ;
Leite, Murillo Martins ;
Zago, Jessica Karla Maia ;
Nunes, Carla Aparecida Bernardes Costa Meneses ;
Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves ;
de Freitas, Gersinei Carlos ;
de Torres, Erica Miranda ;
Lopes, Lawrence Gonzaga .
BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
[7]   A Three-step Etch-and-Rinse vs a Universal Adhesive in Nanohybrid Composite Anterior Restorations: A Retrospective Clinical Evaluation [J].
Comba, Allegra ;
Baldi, Andrea ;
Carossa, Massimo ;
Paolone, Gaetano ;
Stura, Ilaria ;
Migliaretti, Giuseppe ;
Scotti, Nicola .
JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 25 (01) :87-97
[8]   Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool [J].
Corbett, Mark S. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Woolacott, Nerys F. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (01) :79-85
[9]   Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations [J].
Costa, T. R. S. ;
Rezende, M. ;
Sakamoto, A. ;
Bittencourt, B. ;
Dalzochio, P. ;
Loguercio, A. D. ;
Reis, A. .
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 42 (02) :143-154
[10]   Current modifications of dental adhesive systems for composite resin restorations: a review in literature [J].
Dionysopoulos, Dimitrios ;
Gerasimidou, Olga ;
Papadopoulos, Constantinos .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 36 (05) :453-468