The richness of the stimulus: Constructional variation and development in child-directed speech

被引:0
作者
Bunzeck, Bastian [1 ]
Diessel, Holger [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Jena, Germany
关键词
Child-directed speech; constructions; lexical frames; acquisition of grammar; usage-based; RELATIVE CLAUSES; ACQUISITION; LANGUAGE; QUESTIONS; INPUT; INFORMATION; NETWORKS; QUALITY; ENGLISH; GERMAN;
D O I
10.1177/01427237241303225
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
In a seminal study, Cameron-Faulkner et al. made two important observations about utterance-level constructions in English child-directed speech (CDS). First, they observed that canonical in/transitive sentences are surprisingly infrequent in child-direct speech (given that SVO word order is often thought to play a key role in the acquisition of English syntax). Second, they found that many CDS constructions are introduced by a lexical frame (such as Let's. . ., There is . . ., or What do you . . .?). Using a much larger and more diverse dataset than Cameron-Faulkner et al., this study shows that CDS constructions vary with two important factors: (1) the interactive situation and (2) children's age. While canonical in/transitive sentences are not particularly frequent in free toy play sessions, they are predominant in other social situations (e.g. during mealtimes and shared book reading sessions) and they increase in frequency as children get older. Furthermore, our data show that the different CDS constructions occur with different types of frames that vary in length and structure. Many CDS constructions include a short lexical frame consisting of one or two words, but questions are often introduced by extensive frames formed from a small set of lexical items that follow a power-law distribution. Considering these findings, we argue that the lexical and structural properties of CDS constructions are likely to facilitate the acquisition of English grammar and, in particular, the acquisition of questions.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 176
页数:25
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Arnon I., 2016, The acquisition of Hebrew: Trends in language acquisition research series, P221, DOI [10.1075/tilar.19.07arn, DOI 10.1075/TILAR.19.07ARN]
[2]  
Baroni M, 2009, HANDB SPRACH KOMMUN, V29, P803
[3]  
BATES E, 1984, CHILD DEV, V55, P341
[4]   Constructivist Approaches to First Language Acquisition [J].
Behrens, Heike .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2021, 48 (05) :959-983
[5]   Everyday language input and production in 1,001 children from six continents [J].
Bergelson, Elika ;
Soderstrom, Melanie ;
Schwarz, Iris-Corinna ;
Rowland, Caroline F. ;
Ramirez-Esparza, Nairan ;
Hamrick, Lisa R. ;
Marklund, Ellen ;
Kalashnikova, Marina ;
Guez, Ava ;
Casillas, Marisa ;
Benetti, Lucia ;
van Alphen, Petra ;
Cristia, Alejandrina .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (52)
[6]   Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited [J].
Berwick, Robert C. ;
Pietroski, Paul ;
Yankama, Beracah ;
Chomsky, Noam .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2011, 35 (07) :1207-1242
[7]  
Bever T.G., 1970, COGNITION DEV LANGUA, P279, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199677139.003.0001, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0001]
[8]   CHILDRENS 1ST WORD COMBINATIONS [J].
BRAINE, MDS ;
BOWERMAN, M .
MONOGRAPHS OF THE SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1976, 41 (01) :1-104
[9]   The acquisition of German relative clauses: A case study [J].
Brandt, Silke ;
Diessel, Holger ;
Tomasello, Michael .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2008, 35 (02) :325-348
[10]  
Bybee J., 2007, FREQUENCY USE ORG LA, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195301571.001.0001]