Does Administrative Burden Influence Support for a Low-Income Child Care Supplement? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

被引:1
作者
Yang, Yang [1 ]
Hopkins, Vincent [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Johnson Shoyama Grad Sch Publ Policy, Rm 154,101 DiefenbakerPlace, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B8, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Polit Sci, Buchanan Bldg,Block C425,1866 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE | 2024年 / 57卷 / 04期
关键词
administrative burden; child care; deservingness; vignette experiment; willingness to pay; charge administrative; garde d'enfants; m & eacute; rite; exp & eacute; rimentation par vignettes; volont & eacute; de payer; PUBLIC SUPPORT; WELFARE; PERCEPTIONS; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1017/S0008423924000350
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The Canada-wide Early Learning and Child Care Plan promises to help low-income parents, especially women, participate in the economy. But even under this plan, care will be too expensive for many families. Several provinces offer targeted subsidies to reduce fees-unfortunately, these benefits are often hard to access and their popularity with voters is unclear. Using a pre-registered survey experiment (N=821), this research note investigates support for a hypothetical child care supplement to help low-income families. Overall, we find strong support for such an initiative, but little enthusiasm to pay for it through new income taxes. We then manipulate the ease of accessing this benefit. We find little evidence that burdensome child care benefits are more popular than easily accessible benefits. If anything, burdensome benefits reduce support. We then briefly consider how partisanship influences support. We conclude with timely recommendations for government and discuss the need for accessible child care benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 912
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] The Urban-Rural Divide in Canadian Federal Elections, 1896-2019
    Armstrong, David A., II
    Lucas, Jack
    Taylor, Zack
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2022, 55 (01): : 84 - 106
  • [2] The Intersectionality of Deservingness for State Support
    Assouline, Michaela
    Gilad, Sharon
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2022, 82 (03) : 487 - 502
  • [3] Beland D., 2017, World Affairs, V180, P64, DOI [10.1177/0043820017715570, DOI 10.1177/0043820017715570]
  • [4] Understanding Universality within a Liberal Welfare Regime: The Case of Universal Social Programs in Canada
    Beland, Daniel
    Marchildon, Gregory P.
    Prince, Michael J.
    [J]. SOCIAL INCLUSION, 2020, 8 (01) : 124 - 132
  • [5] Public opinion on welfare state recalibration in times of austerity: evidence from survey experiments
    Bremer, Bjorn
    Burgisser, Reto
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2023, 11 (01) : 34 - 52
  • [6] The Effect of Administrative Burden on Bureaucratic Perception of Policies: Evidence from Election Administration
    Burden, Barry C.
    Canon, David T.
    Mayer, Kenneth R.
    Moynihan, Donald P.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2012, 72 (05) : 741 - 751
  • [7] When political values and perceptions of deservingness collide: Evaluating public support for homelessness investments in Canada
    Doberstein, Carey
    Smith, Alison
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE, 2019, 28 (03) : 282 - 292
  • [8] Race, "Deservingness," and Social Spending Attitudes: The Role of Policy Delivery Mechanism
    Ellis, Christopher
    Faricy, Christopher
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 42 (03) : 819 - 843
  • [9] Ellis Christopher, 2021, The Other Side of the Coin: Public Opinion Toward Social Tax Expenditures
  • [10] Esping-Andersen G., 1990, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism