Rationalizing the Superior Catalytic Efficiency of Nickel Nitride vs Nickel Sulfide for Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution Reaction from Bubble Dynamics Study and Density Functional Theory (DFT) Calculations

被引:1
作者
Tyagi, Chinkit [1 ]
Basera, Pooja [2 ,3 ]
Lagrost, Corinne [1 ,4 ]
Bouquet, Valerie [1 ]
Tessier, Franck [1 ]
Jullien, Marie-Caroline [5 ]
Fabre, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, CNRS, UMR6226, ISCR Inst Sci Chim Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] SUNCAT Ctr Interface Sci & Catalysis, SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[4] ScanMAT UAR 2025, F-35000 Rennes, France
[5] Univ Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6251, IPR Inst Phys Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France
来源
ACS CATALYSIS | 2025年 / 15卷 / 05期
关键词
water splitting; hydrogen evolution reaction; electrocatalysis; bubble dynamics; nickel nitrides; nickel sulfides; OXYGEN EVOLUTION; NI3N NANOSHEETS; WATER; SURFACE; ELECTROCATALYST; ACTIVATION; ELECTRODES; OXIDATION; KINETICS; SHEETS;
D O I
10.1021/acscatal.4c05777
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Due to their high electronic conductivity, high catalytic activity, and superior chemical stability, nickel nitrides and sulfides have been demonstrated to be cost-effective and robust electrocatalysts for achieving HER under alkaline conditions. Herein, we report on a simple and optimized approach to directly grow single-phase nickel nitride (Ni3N) and nickel sulfide (Ni3S2) on a flat nickel substrate. Different preparation conditions are tested in order to achieve materials exhibiting the best electrocatalytic efficiency for HER. The optimized Ni3N and Ni3S2 on nickel are obtained at 700 degrees C for 30 min under ammonia gas flow and at 350 degrees C for 1 h in 10% H2S/H2 gas mixture, respectively. Ni3N operate HER in 1 M KOH more efficiently than Ni3S2, as supported by overpotential values of 0.189, 0.291, and 0.342 V measured at 10, 100, and 200 mA cm-2, respectively, which are lower than those measured for Ni3S2, i.e., 0.204, 0.351, and 0.417 V. Remarkably, it is worth noticing that its HER activity competes with that of Pt for current densities higher than 200 mA cm-2. Its superior catalytic activity is corroborated by additional cyclic voltammetry (Tafel slopes) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements. Moreover, Ni3N and Ni3S2 are found to be stable over 45 h of electrolysis at 10 mA cm-2 with a potential change of only 24 and 31 mV, respectively. To gain further understanding on the electrocatalytic HER activities of both materials, density functional theory (DFT) calculations and an in situ bubble dynamics study are performed. Owing to the more hydrophilic character of Ni3N, smaller H2 bubbles form and detach more rapidly from the surface which leads to a fast renewal of the active surface for HER. In contrast, for Ni3S2, both the bubble size and the retention time increase, leading to the adverse blockage of the active sites and requiring higher overpotential for HER. This observation perfectly aligns with DFT calculations, which show that H2O adsorption is predominantly favored on the Ni3N surface. Our work highlights that the use of a planar electrocatalyst support instead of a foam-type porous one is essential to evaluate the alone contribution of the electrocatalyst on the electrogenerated gas bubble dynamics and consequently the impact on the catalytic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:3823 / 3835
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Terlouw T., Bauer C., McKenna R., Mazzotti M., Large-Scale Hydrogen Production via Water Electrolysis: A Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment, Energy Environ. Sci., 15, pp. 3583-3602, (2022)
  • [2] Kumar S.S., Lim H., An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production, Energy Rep., 8, pp. 13793-13813, (2022)
  • [3] The Future of Hydrogen, (2019)
  • [4] Ledendecker M., Mondschein J.S., Kasian O., Geiger S., Gohl D., Schalenbach M., Zeradjanin A., Cherevko S., Schaak R.E., Mayrhofer K., Stability and Activity of Non-Noble-Metal-Based Catalysts Toward the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 56, pp. 9767-9771, (2017)
  • [5] Wu H., Feng C., Zhang L., Zhang J., Wilkinson D.P., Non-Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Water Electrolysis, Electrochem. Energy Rev., 4, pp. 473-507, (2021)
  • [6] Zou X., Zhang Y., Noble Metal-Free Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts for Water Splitting, Chem. Soc. Rev., 44, pp. 5148-5180, (2015)
  • [7] Anantharaj S., Ede S.R., Sakthikumar K., Karthick K., Mishra S., Kundu S., Recent Trends and Perspectives in Electrochemical Water Splitting with an Emphasis on Sulfide, Selenide, and Phosphide Catalysts of Fe, Co, and Ni: A Review, ACS Catal., 6, pp. 8069-8097, (2016)
  • [8] Zhong Y., Xia X., Shi F., Zhan J., Tu J., Fan H.J., Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides in Energy Storage and Conversion, Adv. Sci., 3, (2016)
  • [9] Benck J.D., Hellstern T.R., Kibsgaard J., Chakthranont P., Jaramillo T.F., Catalyzing the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) with Molybdenum Sulfide Nanomaterials, ACS Catal., 4, pp. 3957-3971, (2014)
  • [10] Kawashima K., Marquez R.A., Smith L.A., Vaidyula R.R., Carrasco-Jaim O.A., Wang Z., Son Y.J., Cao C.L., Mullins C.B., A Review of Transition Metal Boride, Carbide, Pnictide, and Chalcogenide Water Oxidation Electrocatalysts, Chem. Rev., 123, pp. 12795-13208, (2023)