Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Older Adults or Adults With Disability With Migraine

被引:0
作者
Yang, Seonkyeong [1 ]
Orlova, Yulia [2 ]
Park, Haesuk [1 ]
Smith, Steven M. [1 ,3 ]
Guo, Yi [4 ]
Chapin, Benjamin A. [5 ,6 ]
Wilson, Debbie L. [1 ]
Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Coll Pharm, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Jacksonville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Ctr Integrat Cardiovasc & Metab Dis, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Biomed Informat, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Univ Florida, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] North Florida South Georgia Vet Hlth Syst, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Gainesville, FL USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Pharmaceut Policy & Prescribing, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
GENE-RELATED PEPTIDE; ICD-10-CM DIAGNOSIS CODES; STROKE; VALIDATION; CARDIOPROTECTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HYPERTENSION; PERFORMANCE; RELEASE; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4537
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Importance Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP mAbs) offer effective migraine-specific preventive treatment. However, concerns exist about their potential cardiovascular risks due to CGRP blockade. Objective To compare the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) between Medicare beneficiaries with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP-mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, sequential cohort study was conducted among a nationally representative population-based sample of Medicare claims from May 2018 through December 2020. Data analysis was performed from August to December 2023. This study included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 18 years or older with migraine who initiated either anti-CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA. Beneficiaries who had a history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cluster headache, malignant cancer, or hospice service within a 1-year baseline period prior to treatment initiation were excluded. To minimize channeling bias from new drug introductions and time-related bias due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 5 cohorts were established, representing sequential 6-month calendar intervals based on the initial prescription or date of index anti-CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA use. Exposure Anti-CGRP mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was time to first MI or stroke. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive crisis, peripheral revascularization, and Raynaud phenomenon. The inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes between the 2 treatment groups. Results Among 266 848 eligible patients with migraine, 5153 patients initiated anti-CGRP mAbs (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [14.0] years; 4308 female patients [83.6%]) and 4000 patients initiated onabotulinumtoxinA (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [13.7] years; 3353 female patients [83.8%]). Use of anti-CGRP mAbs was not associated with an increased risk of composite CVD events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.77), hypertensive crisis (aHR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.14-1.55), peripheral revascularization (aHR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.48-4.73), or Raynaud phenomenon (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.45-1.24) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA. Subgroup analyses by age group and presence of established non-MI or stroke CVD showed similar findings. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, despite initial concerns regarding the cardiovascular effects of CGRP blockade, anti-CGRP mAbs were not associated with an increased risk of CVD compared with onabotulinumtoxinA among adult Medicare beneficiaries with migraine, who were predominantly older adults or individuals with disability. Future studies with longer follow-up periods and in other populations are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 141
页数:10
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice [J].
Ailani, Jessica ;
Burch, Rebecca C. ;
Robbins, Matthew S. .
HEADACHE, 2021, 61 (07) :1021-1039
[2]   A systematic review of validated methods for identifying cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack using administrative data [J].
Andrade, Susan E. ;
Harrold, Leslie R. ;
Tjia, Jennifer ;
Cutrona, Sarah L. ;
Saczynski, Jane S. ;
Dodd, Katherine S. ;
Goldberg, Robert J. ;
Gurwitz, Jerry H. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 21 :100-128
[3]  
[Anonymous], AREA HLTH RESOURCES
[4]   Ischemic Stroke Associated With Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Inhibitor Therapy for Migraine: A Case Report [J].
Aradi, Stephen ;
Kaiser, Eric ;
Cucchiara, Brett .
JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 28 (10)
[5]   Raynaud's phenomenon associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists case report [J].
Bedrin, Kate ;
Ailani, Jessica ;
Dougherty, Carrie .
HEADACHE, 2022, 62 (10) :1419-1423
[6]   Evaluation of the Safety of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Antagonists for Migraine Treatment Among Adults With Raynaud Phenomenon [J].
Breen, Ilana D. ;
Brumfiel, Caitlin M. ;
Patel, Meera H. ;
Butterfield, Richard J. ;
VanderPluym, Juliana H. ;
Griffing, Leroy ;
Pittelkow, Mark R. ;
Mangold, Aaron R. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (04)
[7]   Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Nonexperimental Research [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Wyss, Richard ;
Layton, J. Bradley ;
Stuerner, Til .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2013, 6 (05) :604-611
[8]  
Cefalu M., PACKAGETWANGTOOLKIT
[9]   Myocardial infarction in a patient with migraine and triptan overuse treated with anti-CGRP receptor monoclonal antibody: a case report [J].
Cetta, I. ;
Messina, R. ;
Colombo, B. ;
Filippi, M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 269 (09) :5170-5172
[10]   The role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in ischemic preconditioning in isolated rat hearts [J].
Chai, WX ;
Mehrotra, S ;
Danser, AHJ ;
Schoemaker, RG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 531 (1-3) :246-253